2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-3094-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization algorithms for flow shop scheduling problem: a review and prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among different methods, we can highlight the algorithms proposed by Palmer (1965), Campbell et al (1970 and Nawaz et al (1983). , Vallada et al (2008) and Pan and Ruiz (2013) presented extensive reviews for FS and PFS problems with single objective functions, while Sun et al (2010) and Yenisey and Yagmahan (2014) applied it for multi-objective FS problems. Although, evaluated 25 heuristics and metaheuristics for makespan minimization.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among different methods, we can highlight the algorithms proposed by Palmer (1965), Campbell et al (1970 and Nawaz et al (1983). , Vallada et al (2008) and Pan and Ruiz (2013) presented extensive reviews for FS and PFS problems with single objective functions, while Sun et al (2010) and Yenisey and Yagmahan (2014) applied it for multi-objective FS problems. Although, evaluated 25 heuristics and metaheuristics for makespan minimization.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Pan and Ruiz (2013) compared 22 existing heuristics to minimize the flowtime and proposed five new methods to solve the problem. On the other hand, the reviews of Sun et al (2010) and Yenisey and Yagmahan (2014), in spite of presenting a multiobjective FS literature survey, mentioned few works dealt with weighted tardiness as one of the objectives assessed and also no review was found in TWT minimization. …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first HFS problem was described by Salvador [10], vast amounts of academic work have been carried out on HFS scheduling due to its complexity and practical relevance [11][12][13][14][15]. Different kinds of methods (e.g., exact methods, heuristics and metaheuristics) were proposed to minimize a variety of objectives, which include the maximum completion time, the maximum flow time, the number of late jobs [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in practical applications, there are many objectives that have been considered in scheduling problems. This has indicated that evaluating a single objective is not satisfactory for improving the performance of the complete manufacturing systems [29]. In addition, satisfying a single objective cannot resolve the trade-off between criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%