2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-017-0772-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization and decision making for greenhouse climate control system considering user preference and data clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For FI-PID controllers, there are four parameters that need to be tuned, including the rate of reaction K, the coefficient of stabilizing effect η, the integral coefficient k i ′ , and the differential coefficient k d ′ [14,15]. Appropriate optimization objectives are important for parameter tuning, and it is a multiobjective optimization problem in general [7][8][9][10][11]. With an optimization model and a corresponding algorithm, an optimization process was introduced to solve this problem in the study.…”
Section: Parameters Tuning Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For FI-PID controllers, there are four parameters that need to be tuned, including the rate of reaction K, the coefficient of stabilizing effect η, the integral coefficient k i ′ , and the differential coefficient k d ′ [14,15]. Appropriate optimization objectives are important for parameter tuning, and it is a multiobjective optimization problem in general [7][8][9][10][11]. With an optimization model and a corresponding algorithm, an optimization process was introduced to solve this problem in the study.…”
Section: Parameters Tuning Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xue et al [6] used particle swarm optimization (PSO), Z-N method, and advanced fireworks (AFW) algorithm to tune a PID controller and found that AFW algorithm was more effective than the others. Mahdavian et al [7] used nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) to optimize the control parameters of a PID controller and found that NSGA-II had more advantages than Z-N method. Behroozsarand and Shafiei [8] also designed NSGA-II to tune a PID controller and obtained better control parameters than the T-L method.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mahdavian et al (2016, 2017) used both NSGA-II and post Pareto-optimal pruning algorithm, in an optimisation followed by a decision-making approach. The greenhouse climate control (temperature and lighting) were tuned using the NSGA-II algorithm.…”
Section: Review Of Nabi Metaheuristics For Greenhouse Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%