2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15274-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization can balance trade-offs among boreal caribou, biodiversity, and climate change objectives when conservation hotspots do not overlap

Abstract: The biodiversity and climate change crises have led countries—including Canada—to commit to protect more land and inland waters and to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations. Canada is also obligated to recover populations of at-risk species, including boreal caribou. Canada has the opportunity to expand its protected areas network to protect hotspots of high value for biodiversity and climate mitigation. However, co-occurrence of hotspots is rare. Here we ask: is it possible to expand the network to simultan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overlap among conservation hotspots is often limited and areas of conservation co-benefits may be important for resource extraction or land use activities 10 . An optimization analysis 10 , 14 that not only identifies areas that maximize co-benefits but also evaluates the trade-offs to achieving multiple goals would be a logical next step 49 . This national-scale analyses provides a starting point for regional assessments of the relative importance of biodiversity, ecosystem services, and biocultural elements, including Indigenous rights, tourism and/or recreation, to different partners and stakeholders; an essential next step to developing effective conservation strategies for boreal Canada and perhaps elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overlap among conservation hotspots is often limited and areas of conservation co-benefits may be important for resource extraction or land use activities 10 . An optimization analysis 10 , 14 that not only identifies areas that maximize co-benefits but also evaluates the trade-offs to achieving multiple goals would be a logical next step 49 . This national-scale analyses provides a starting point for regional assessments of the relative importance of biodiversity, ecosystem services, and biocultural elements, including Indigenous rights, tourism and/or recreation, to different partners and stakeholders; an essential next step to developing effective conservation strategies for boreal Canada and perhaps elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, it revealed a spectrum of Paretooptimal solutions, each tailored to different design and performance criteria. This multi-solution landscape is particularly invaluable in real-world applications where design requirements may vary based on specific contexts [68].…”
Section: B Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Wu et al [16] used the Stackelberg game model to establish the optimal contract price and planting area for agricultural cooperatives and proposed a contract coordination mechanism that enhanced the green innovation level and profits of the cooperatives and enterprise. Benez-Secanho et al [17] utilized optimization models to compare the economic value of the ecosystem services provided by alternative land allocations for conservation. The study adopted boundary penalties to determine the trade-offs of choosing higher connectivity among parcels regarding the economic values provided by carbon storage, wildlife habitat, and water quality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al 6 : Differentiated cost sharing, maximizing the goals of the owner, and revenue sharing. The objective function is shown in Equation (17).…”
Section: Alternatives For Contracts Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%