2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization decision-making of quality dependent product recovery for sustainability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flexibility of multi-objective optimization rather than single objective optimization for solving optimization problems, despite several conflicting goals, is another advantage of this approach. Therefore, a desire for solving multi-objective problems led researchers to utilize more exact and complicated processes and patterns based on Pareto front strategy for increasing energy efficiency [28,52,58,122].…”
Section: Single Objective and Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flexibility of multi-objective optimization rather than single objective optimization for solving optimization problems, despite several conflicting goals, is another advantage of this approach. Therefore, a desire for solving multi-objective problems led researchers to utilize more exact and complicated processes and patterns based on Pareto front strategy for increasing energy efficiency [28,52,58,122].…”
Section: Single Objective and Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decision-making issue with the quality-based product recovery was explored in [28] with multiple optimization goals, including economic, environmental, and societal performance of sustainability. In this article, MOEA was utilized for solving the MOOP problem and finding an optimal solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has been done in the field of lean manufacturing (Sahoo et al, 2008;Verrier et al, 2015) which reduced production cost and increases productivity of system but have a negligible effect on energy efficiency of manufacturing system. Other ways of reducing production cost include optimizing the lot size (Naeem et al, 2013), minimizing loss (Batson and Shishoo, 2004), product recovery (Meng et al, 2017) but neither of them energy efficiency of the manufacturing system.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and He [12] propose an optimal pricing model, where the recycled products are repaired and resold as green remanufactured products in the second sales period. As recycling and remanufacturing are usually embedded in a closed-loop supply chain, there are many other works on pricing decisions in recycling and remanufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. To our knowledge, in most existing papers, recycled products are assumed as raw materials for producing new products, and different strategies for remanufacturing recycled products in different conditions are rarely taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%