2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization of hydraulic shovel using evolutionary algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geometrical or operational parameters of hydraulic systems can also be optimized through multiple swarm methods. Xu [63] used twelve multi-objective and many-objective evolutionary algorithms to solve the optimization problem of a hydraulic shovel. The optimization resulted in designing a TriRocker hydraulic shovel and building an 85-ton prototype.…”
Section: Swarm and Neural Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometrical or operational parameters of hydraulic systems can also be optimized through multiple swarm methods. Xu [63] used twelve multi-objective and many-objective evolutionary algorithms to solve the optimization problem of a hydraulic shovel. The optimization resulted in designing a TriRocker hydraulic shovel and building an 85-ton prototype.…”
Section: Swarm and Neural Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical science and engineering applications, problems involving multiple conflicting objectives that need to be optimized at the same time are often referred to as multi-objective optimization problems. For example, urban bus route problem [13], shop scheduling problem [23], multi-agent system optimization problem [12] and engineering vehicle mechanical design [27]. The objective functions in the multi-objective optimization problem conflict with each other, and almost no single solution can satisfy all the objectives at the same time, so it is necessary to make trade-offs between different objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al performed finite element analysis and optimization on the structure of the excavator's boom [12]. Xu et al employed a multiobjective optimization algorithm to optimize the digging force, working range, and other objectives for a hydraulic shovel [13]. Yu et al designed a lightweight bucket with enhanced structural strength based on uncertain loads [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%