2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization of some process parameters of a lab-scale thickener using grey relational analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the input four operating factors and the output variables were normalized to have the same order for the reduction of error. The following three equations were used for the normalization [23,26]:…”
Section: Grey Relational Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the input four operating factors and the output variables were normalized to have the same order for the reduction of error. The following three equations were used for the normalization [23,26]:…”
Section: Grey Relational Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, n value of 0.5 was taken for calculation because it is generally adopted in most studies [23]. Finally, the grey relational grade was determined as the average value of all grey relational coefficients, which represents the influential priority of a factor on the entire system.…”
Section: Grey Relational Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these cases, no single best alternative exists [20]. Grey relational analysis classifies different input sequences by determining the grey relational grade (GRG) [21]. Higher GRG values indicate better alternatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, GRA enables the processing of variables with different attributes, scales, and units. Thus, this method is more versatile than other decision tools [17]. Another characteristic of GRA is the ability to work with variables that are optimized in opposite directions [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%