Multi-Objective Optimization of the Process Parameters of a Grinding Robot Using LSTM-MLP-NSGAII

Abstract

Grinding robots are widely used in the automotive, mechanical processing, aerospace industries, among others, due to their strong adaptability, high safety and intelligence. The grinding process parameters are the main factors that affect the quality and efficiency of grinding robots. However, it is difficult to obtain the optimal combination of the grinding process parameters only by manual experience. This study proposes an artificial intelligence-based method for optimizing the process parameters of a grinding robot using neural networks and a genetic algorithm, with the aim to reduce the workpiece surface roughness and shorten the grinding time. Specifically, this is the first study utilizing a multi-objective optimization approach to optimize the process parameters of a grinding robot. Based on the experimental data of the grinding robot ROKAE XB7, the long short-term memory (LSTM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural networks were trained to fit the quantitative relationships between the process parameters of the grinding robot, such as feed rate, spindle pressure and pneumatic motor pressure, and the result of grinding surface roughness and grinding time. After that, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) was used to calculate the Pareto optimal process parameter combinations using the trained LSTM and MPL model as the objective function. Compared with the method based on manual experience, the process parameters optimized with this method achieved a reduction in surface roughness of at least 13.62% and a reduction in the whole grinding process time of 28%. The excellent grinding results obtained for grinding time and surface roughness validated the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed multi-objective method for the optimization of grinding robots’ process parameters in practical manufacturing applications.

Structural Optimization of Scarfing Machine with Acceleration Profile and Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm Approach

“…As mentioned above, the fitness value is evaluated after assigning a fitness rank to each solution. The process is repeated to identify the Pareto solutions and find the optimal solution that satisfies the objective function [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Figure 3 shows a diagram of the structure of MOGA.…”