2018
DOI: 10.3390/jcs2020022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Patch Optimization with Integrated Kinematic Draping Simulation for Continuous–Discontinuous Fiber-Reinforced Composite Structures

Abstract: Discontinuous fiber-reinforced polymers (DiCoFRP) in combination with local continuous fiber reinforced polymers (CoFRP) provide both a high design freedom and high weight-specific mechanical properties. For the optimization of CoFRP patches on complexly shaped DiCoFRP structures, an optimization strategy is needed which considers manufacturing constraints during the optimization procedure. Therefore, a genetic algorithm is combined with a kinematic draping simulation. To determine the optimal patch position w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To optimise the costs resulting from the tolerances of the laminate design parameters, the methods of tolerance optimisation can be used and adapted to the needs of composite parts. Generally the most common types of tolerance optimisation objectives are distinguished to least cost, best quality and multi-objective optimisation [32], which is as well widely used in composite design [39,40]. Differences of tolerance optimisation of composite structures to common tolerance optimisation are the lack of data for tolerance costs and the difference in the scrutinised design parameters.…”
Section: Manufacturing Tolerance Optimisation For Composite Laminate Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To optimise the costs resulting from the tolerances of the laminate design parameters, the methods of tolerance optimisation can be used and adapted to the needs of composite parts. Generally the most common types of tolerance optimisation objectives are distinguished to least cost, best quality and multi-objective optimisation [32], which is as well widely used in composite design [39,40]. Differences of tolerance optimisation of composite structures to common tolerance optimisation are the lack of data for tolerance costs and the difference in the scrutinised design parameters.…”
Section: Manufacturing Tolerance Optimisation For Composite Laminate Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid continuous-discontinuous composites constitute a new class of materials for structural parts locally bearing increased loads. [1][2][3] In this work, a discontinuous glass fiber-reinforced thermoset is considered. The glass fibers exhibit a length of nearly 25 mm and are embedded into an unsaturated polyester-polyurethane hybrid (UPPH) resin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both, optimisation approaches have been studied in the past. For example, [1] and [2] address ply stack optimisation and patch optimisation for a fix geometry, while [3] focuses on local geometry adjustment for improved structural performance. Typically, current structural optimisation approaches assume perfect manufacturability and do not reflect potential defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%