2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi objective unit commitment with voltage stability and PV uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The voltage stability analysis is critical in the operation of electric power systems. In this regard, Furukakoi et al [14] used the Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) for multi-purpose operation plan to achieve an improved voltage stability and reduce the PV output prediction error and it showed a 6% improvement in the voltage stability index. Moreover, Bode et al [54] used a multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm for optimal penetration of PV, while maintaining the system stability, and it showed an 11% improvement for the novel line stability index.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voltage stability analysis is critical in the operation of electric power systems. In this regard, Furukakoi et al [14] used the Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) for multi-purpose operation plan to achieve an improved voltage stability and reduce the PV output prediction error and it showed a 6% improvement in the voltage stability index. Moreover, Bode et al [54] used a multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm for optimal penetration of PV, while maintaining the system stability, and it showed an 11% improvement for the novel line stability index.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that such voltage deviations can be drastically reduced to 71% by smoothing the fluctuating generation of PV thanks to the usage of energy storage systems (ESSs). In [9], the authors studied operation planning methods by taking into account demand-response programs and PV-battery systems to maximize the stability of the voltage and minimize PV generation forecasting errors and operational costs. Certain other contributions go one step further, and in addition to considering the technical aspects, they analyze the economic part of the derived solution(s).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P D (k) = B * α d / / discharge the battery with the maximum discharging rate9:E(k + 1) = E(k) − P H (k).T u / /update the state of charge of the battery 10: C H (k cp )− = P H (k).T u 11: else 12: P C (k) = B * α c / / charge the battery with the maximum charging rate and cheapest price 13: E(k + 1) = E(k) + P C (k).T u / / update the state of charge of the battery 14: P G (k) = P H (k) / / serve the household demand from the grid 15: K cp = K cp \{k cp } / / remove from the set K cp the cheapest timeslot k cp 16: k cp = CheapestTimeslot(K cp ) / / next cheapest timeslot k cp such that k cp > k 17: C H (k cp ) = ∑ k cp−1 i=k+1 P H (i).T u / / energy consumption until the new cheapest timeslot 18: k) = P H (k) / / serve the household demand from the grid 21: P C (k) = B + α c / / charge the battery with the maximum charging rate 22:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the multiobjective UC problems are formulated as an extension of the stochastic UC problems for the simultaneous realization of more than one objective of system operators. A novel multipurpose operation planning method for minimizing the prediction error of power generated from solar PV generators to achieve the optimal reduction of the operating cost and improve the voltage stability of power systems, simultaneously, was reported in [59]. An optimally scheduled demand response (DR) program and properly sized storage system are considered as the main parameters for voltage stability improvement and PV output prediction error minimization.…”
Section: Multiobjective Uc Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UC problem considers a 138-MW ESS system with 1192-MWh capacity for leveling the load demand, and it considers ESSs constraints such as SOC constraint, Equation (50); maximum, and minimum limits, Equation (51); maximum charge constraint, Equation (52); minimum charge constraint, Equation (53); discharge power rating, Equation (54); disable simultaneous charging and discharging, Equation (55); charge ramp-up, Equation (56); charge ramp-down, Equation (57); discharge ramp-up, Equation (58); and discharge ramp-down, Equation (59). Figure 1 shows that the UC problem without considering the ESS system involves turning on all the 10 TG units, as shown in Figure 2, in order to meet the load demand.…”
Section: Ess With Uc Programmentioning
confidence: 99%