2008 16th IEEE International Conference on Networks 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icon.2008.4772612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-path BGP (MBGP): A solution for improving network bandwidth utilization and defense against link failures in inter-domain routing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section describes a routing architecture and a protocol, BGP-MHLB/I (BGP-Multi-Home Load Balancing /Inbound), which extends MBGP protocol for multiple BGP path routing [6]. BGP-MHLB/I protocol performs the following functions:…”
Section: Mhlb/i Routing For Inbound Dynamic Load Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This section describes a routing architecture and a protocol, BGP-MHLB/I (BGP-Multi-Home Load Balancing /Inbound), which extends MBGP protocol for multiple BGP path routing [6]. BGP-MHLB/I protocol performs the following functions:…”
Section: Mhlb/i Routing For Inbound Dynamic Load Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) (r 12 , r 9 , t 0 ), (R 5 , r 6 Figure 6, it constructs the MHLB/I routing table (Table 3). When the source MHMB receives a PATH_NOTIFY, it announces a detected path to each involved MHLB/I router using PATH_SETUP messages.…”
Section: Mhlb/i Routing For Inbound Dynamic Load Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of disseminating additional routes has been extended to Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), the current de facto inter-domain routing protocol, to address the reliability issues of the current Internet [27], [10], [18], [15], [28], [30], [7], [19], [2], eliminate policy violation [4], [17], [20], or enable end users to select paths appropriate to their applications. However, most of those proposals do not concern the security issues caused by multiple path dissemination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous work focuses on the flexibility of multipath control that allows the end users to choose the paths [4], [8], [15], [20], [24]- [26], [31]. For example, MIRO [24] allows ASes to have more control over the flow of traffic in their networks, as well as enable quick reaction to path failures.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, MIRO [24] allows ASes to have more control over the flow of traffic in their networks, as well as enable quick reaction to path failures. MBGP [8] focuses on improving network bandwidth. However, MBGP is not an efficient solution for Internet-wide multipath routing because it uses message flooding to discovery the multiple paths.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%