2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mprp.2016.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-physical simulation of selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the sensitivity of the relative density to the three process parameters decreased according to the following order: laser power > scan speed > hatching distance. This result is consistent with previous results and could be ascribed to the special thermophysical properties of tungsten and tungsten heavy alloys [31]. In this section, the nearly full densification of the 90W-7Ni-3Fe sample fabricated by SLM was realized.…”
Section: Densification Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, the sensitivity of the relative density to the three process parameters decreased according to the following order: laser power > scan speed > hatching distance. This result is consistent with previous results and could be ascribed to the special thermophysical properties of tungsten and tungsten heavy alloys [31]. In this section, the nearly full densification of the 90W-7Ni-3Fe sample fabricated by SLM was realized.…”
Section: Densification Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some effort has been made in this field and a wide range of applications are reported in the literature, including but not limited to hardening [ 4 ], laser ablation [ 5 ], laser cutting [ 6 ], laser drilling [ 7 ], laser welding [ 8 , 9 ], and additive manufacturing of metal powder [ 10 , 11 ]. Irrespective of the application, the prediction of the temperature field is crucial for many purposes, including but not limited to non-destructive real-time evaluation of the process [ 2 ], minimization of residual stresses, and heat accumulation during additive manufacturing [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The width of the laser track, which is strongly related to the scanning patch, is an important factor affecting the final material. Therefore, it is considered to be an effective verification method to compare the simulation width with experiments [ 48 ]. In order to verify the credibility of this model, two different experiments were conducted to observe the width of the melt channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%