45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2007
DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Point Aero-Structural Optimization of Wings Including Planform Variations

Abstract: This paper focuses on wing optimization via control theory using a multi-point design method. Based on the design methodology previously developed for wing section and planform optimization at a specific flight condition, it searches for a single wing shape that performs well over a range of flight conditions. Our previous experience with multipoint design without a detailed FE structural model, showed improvements in performance measures such as drag divergence Mach number and the lift-to-drag ratio over a ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the model is perturbed and given the correct pressure distribution of the original airfoil; the algorithm should nd the airfoil shape in a few optimization cycles. For each ight condition stated in Tables 1 and 2, we use an adjoint gradient based optimization algorithm (based on [24]) to nd optimum values for the bump parameters towards the least drag coe cient. Table 5 shows the initial values of the selected ve design parameters.…”
Section: The Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the model is perturbed and given the correct pressure distribution of the original airfoil; the algorithm should nd the airfoil shape in a few optimization cycles. For each ight condition stated in Tables 1 and 2, we use an adjoint gradient based optimization algorithm (based on [24]) to nd optimum values for the bump parameters towards the least drag coe cient. Table 5 shows the initial values of the selected ve design parameters.…”
Section: The Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reuther et al (1999a, b), Mirzaei et al (2007) and Jameson et al (2007). The latter may be expressed as…”
Section: Robust Design Optimization Versus Multi-point Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is at the forefront of aerodynamic analysis capabilities, and application of numerical optimization algorithms with such analysis is termed aerodynamic shape optimization (ASO), and has already produced notable results. [1][2][3] Compressible CFD has been used in numerous optimizations of two-dimensional aerofoil sections, 4, 5 threedimensional aircraft, [6][7][8] and three-dimensional aeroelastic aircraft, 9,10 and there has been a recent increase in activity in the rotor area. [11][12][13][14][15] The authors have also presented work in the optimization area, having developed a modularised, generic optimization tool that is applicable to any aerodynamic problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%