2014 19th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icdsp.2014.6900771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-polarization through-the-wall radar imaging using joint Bayesian compressed sensing

Abstract: This paper presents a new image formation method for multi-polarization through-the-wall radar imaging. The proposed method combines wall clutter mitigation and scene reconstruction in a unified framework using multitask Bayesian compressed sensing. First, the radar signals are jointly recovered using Bayesian compressed sensing in the wavelet domain. Then, a subspace projection method is employed to mitigate the front wall reflections. This is followed by principal component analysis, which is used to compres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 3(c) shows the sparse reconstruction result based on the method proposed in [5], which considers group sparsity across multiple polarization modes within the BCS framework. It is evident that the algorithm generates a low quality reconstruction result with many isolated and spurious pixels due to lack of consideration of the underlying target structure.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 3(c) shows the sparse reconstruction result based on the method proposed in [5], which considers group sparsity across multiple polarization modes within the BCS framework. It is evident that the algorithm generates a low quality reconstruction result with many isolated and spurious pixels due to lack of consideration of the underlying target structure.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In group sparsity, the nonzero scattering coefficients have a common support for different polarizations, but their exact values may differ. The aformentioned properties have been separately considered in the context of TWRI to improve the sparse reconstruction performance, leading to higher imaging resolution, clutter reduction, and target separability [3]- [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several imaging algorithms based on compressive sensing (CS) technique have been developed for polarimetric TWRI system to reduce the polarimetric measurement data and enhance the imaging quality. In [6], the multitask Bayesian CS (MT-BCS) framework is employed to simultaneously reconstruct the images associated with all polarimetric channels and provide the enhanced image quality compared to the imaging results formed individually for each polarization channel. A modified clustered MT-BCS algorithm which combines the multipolarization sensing group sparsity and spatially clustered sparsity is proposed in [7] to achieve enhanced imaging capability for extended targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], CS is firstly applied to recover the missing radar measurements and then a wall clutter mitigation method, using spatial filtering [17] or a subspace projection technique [18], is applied to remove the wall returns. In [14] and [15], sparse representation is used to first estimate the signal coefficients, and then singular value decomposition (SVD) is applied directly on the estimated coefficients in order to segregate the wall returns from the target signal. In the SVD-based wall clutter mitigation method [14], [15], [18], the wall and target subspaces are obtained from a two-dimensional data matrix, where one dimension represents the signal (or coefficient) index and the other represents the antenna index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14] and [15], sparse representation is used to first estimate the signal coefficients, and then singular value decomposition (SVD) is applied directly on the estimated coefficients in order to segregate the wall returns from the target signal. In the SVD-based wall clutter mitigation method [14], [15], [18], the wall and target subspaces are obtained from a two-dimensional data matrix, where one dimension represents the signal (or coefficient) index and the other represents the antenna index. However, since the number of signal samples is often greater than the number of antennas, reducing the latter decreases the rank of the matrix, thus making it harder to separate the target subspace from the wall subspace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%