2016
DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2015.1133450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-population mortality models: fitting, forecasting and comparisons

Abstract: We review a number of multi-population mortality models: variations of the Li and Lee (2005) model, and the common-age-effect (CAE) model of Kleinow (2014). Model parameters are estimated using maximum likelihood. Although this introduces some challenging identifiability problems and complicates the estimation process it allows a fair comparison of the different models. We propose to solve these identifiability problems by applying two dimensional constraints over the parameters. Using data from six countries,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mortality forecasts are, currently, almost exclusively performed using models which decompose age-specific mortality rates into age, period, and sometimes also cohort effects, inspired by the Lee and Carter (1992) (LC) model, which is the most popular mortality forecasting model in countries with data of high quality (Booth, 2006;Cairns et al, 2009;Enchev et al, 2017). One major limitation with the LC type of models is that they generally underestimate improvements in mortality as a result of assuming constant age-specific and relative improvements (Bergeron-Boucher et al, 2017a;Booth and Tickle, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality forecasts are, currently, almost exclusively performed using models which decompose age-specific mortality rates into age, period, and sometimes also cohort effects, inspired by the Lee and Carter (1992) (LC) model, which is the most popular mortality forecasting model in countries with data of high quality (Booth, 2006;Cairns et al, 2009;Enchev et al, 2017). One major limitation with the LC type of models is that they generally underestimate improvements in mortality as a result of assuming constant age-specific and relative improvements (Bergeron-Boucher et al, 2017a;Booth and Tickle, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…75 See also Jarner and Kryger 2011 Still living with mortality multi-population models. Despite the general popularity of the Li & Lee (2005) model, their model has been found to be quite unsuitable for some actuarial applications by both Villegas et al (2017) and Enchev et al (2017). Specifically, applications that require a stochastic assessment of longevity risk (e.g.…”
Section: Extrapolative or Time Series Models -Multi-population Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we provide an overview of different approaches to modelling mortality as well as their estimation methodologies. Our focus will be on single population mortality modelling, however the essential elements of the approaches and methods discussed can be carried over to multi-population settings, see for example Enchev et al (2016).…”
Section: State-space Approach To Mortality Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach employs regression-based methods to calibrate mortality models (Brouhns et al, 2002). For some recent studies based on this approach, see O'Hare and Li (2012), van Berkum et al (2016 and Enchev et al (2016). The recent paper Currie (2016) provides a comprehensive summary on mortality modelling based on the generalised linear modelling (GLM) framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%