2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-protease Approach for the Improved Identification and Molecular Characterization of Small Proteins and Short Open Reading Frame-Encoded Peptides

Abstract: The identification of proteins below approximately 70–100 amino acids in bottom-up proteomics is still a challenging task due to the limited number of peptides generated by proteolytic digestion. This includes the short open reading frame-encoded peptides (SEPs), which are a subset of the small proteins that were not previously annotated or that are alternatively encoded. Here, we systematically investigated the use of multiple proteases (trypsin, chymotrypsin, LysC, LysargiNase, and GluC) in GeLC–MS/MS analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solid-phase extracƟon [26,27,32,33]. Using reagents such as SDS or guanidinium hydrochloride can also aid the extraction of membrane-associated small proteins [34].…”
Section: Enrichment Of Small Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solid-phase extracƟon [26,27,32,33]. Using reagents such as SDS or guanidinium hydrochloride can also aid the extraction of membrane-associated small proteins [34].…”
Section: Enrichment Of Small Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mainly used protease in proteomics is trypsin, the usage of multiple proteases can dramatically increase the sequence coverage and confidence of the identified small proteins [32,51,54].…”
Section: Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much efforts have focused on optimizing MS-based workflows (Bartel et al, 2020;Peng et al, 2020;Fabre et al, 2021), where a traditional bottom-up strategy with an enzymatic digestion prior to MS-analysis has often been favored (Fabre et al, 2021). Several adaptations of the separation (Kaulich et al, 2020) or enrichment (Petruschke et al, 2020) and digestion methods (Kaulich et al, 2021) have been investigated and further applied in a wide variety of biological settings, but only a limited number of studies consider the top-down strategy as a potential workflow in SEP discovery (Li et al, 2017;Budamgunta et al, 2018;Cassidy et al, 2021). Nevertheless, unlike bottom-up workflows, this alternative method delivers valuable information about proteoforms, C-or N-terminal specific characteristics and post-translational modifications (Cassidy et al, 2021) that are linked to biological functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, unlike bottom-up workflows, this alternative method delivers valuable information about proteoforms, C-or N-terminal specific characteristics and post-translational modifications (Cassidy et al, 2021) that are linked to biological functions. Additionally, the potential limited number of tryptic peptides present in SEPs (Kaulich et al, 2021) or short neuropeptides is counteracted by omitting the enzymatic digestion prior to analysis. Here, 48 sORFs of 84 sORFs identified on non-coding regions are peptides without a basic C-terminus, which would have been lost during conventional bottom-up strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the use of alternative digestion protocols has been proposed to further facilitate the discovery of SEPs and to increase the number of peptides produced (Kaulich et al, 2021). Creating an in silico S. typhimurium tryptic digestion map for all annotated (genome assembly ASM21085v2; 2 missed cleavages allowed) proteins results in 4420 identifiable SEP-derived peptides falling within typical MS-detection limits (mass range of 600-4,600 Da, ≥7 aa), originating from 423 out of 476 annotated S. Typhimurium SEPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%