2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91204-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-run Memory Tests for Pattern Sensitive Faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a digital system, a comparison of the logical behavior of the tested system with the behavior of the good system is often used when conducting the test. Therefore, there is a need for all physical failures during manufacturing to be modeled as logical faults [5].…”
Section: Memory Functional Fault Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a digital system, a comparison of the logical behavior of the tested system with the behavior of the good system is often used when conducting the test. Therefore, there is a need for all physical failures during manufacturing to be modeled as logical faults [5].…”
Section: Memory Functional Fault Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the results obtained for can be easily generalized to other classes of pattern sensitive faults, since is the memory fault model that is most difficult to detect and that covers other types of faults [ 13 , 14 , 25 ]. The number of all possible for with the N bits is determined according to expression ( 1 ) [ 13 , 26 ]. …”
Section: Transparent Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum possible number of detected faults when using a single run march test is determined according to ( 2 ) [ 13 , 26 ]. …”
Section: Transparent Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations