2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2011.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale analyses on seismic damage and progressive failure of steel structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beam elements are connected to the shell/solid elements using constraint equations or constraining elements. The constraint equation or the constraint element is employed to standardize the DOFs of the global model boundary, which are equal to the DOFs of the local model boundary [35]. Nie et al [36] used the constraint equation method to build a multi-scale model of a cable anchorage system for a suspension bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam elements are connected to the shell/solid elements using constraint equations or constraining elements. The constraint equation or the constraint element is employed to standardize the DOFs of the global model boundary, which are equal to the DOFs of the local model boundary [35]. Nie et al [36] used the constraint equation method to build a multi-scale model of a cable anchorage system for a suspension bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-scale model composed of beam elements and solid elements or shell elements has been proposed and extensively employed in FEM analysis on RC structures owing to its high computational efficiency [16]. Meanwhile, various kinds of two-scale modeling methods have been successfully applied in the damage and failure analysis of civil structures under earthquakes [16][17][18][19][20]. Moreover, the mesoscale modeling approach has been successfully applied in the numerical simulation of concrete structures subjected to various loading cases [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method inevitably raises computational costs because of the numerous elements and nodes and increases the probability of operational errors or collapses with many uncertainties. [16][17][18] The second method is based on the multiscale FE modeling technique, [19][20][21][22][23] which typically includes submodeling 24,25 and substructure methods. 26,27 For the submodeling method, the selection of boundary conditions is complicated by compatibility issues among models with di®erent scales in the transition regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%