2016
DOI: 10.2174/1874836801610010312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Scale Analysis of In-plane Behaviour of Tuff Masonry

Abstract: Various methodologies are available today in engineering professional practice to analyse structures, in particular in the field of masonry structures. Many of the methods are derived from reinforced concrete frames but sometimes they suffer of lack of comprehensive experimental validation due to difficulties to simulate the many different kinds of masonries and they suffer from lack of critical comparison between them. In fact some methods seem to be able to provide accurate results, but are extremely expensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of the above and despite the plethora of mathematical models that have been proposed for the modeling of masonry structures, for real masonry structures, it is preferable to use simplified macro-models such as modeling the masonry as a one-phase material (macro-modeling approach) while the use of more sophisticated micro-models is suggested for the modeling of special parts of the masonry structural model. Detailed works on the advantages and disadvantages among different mathematical models about masonry structures can be found in [40,100,101,155,156].…”
Section: Modeling Masonry Using Equivalent Frame Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the above and despite the plethora of mathematical models that have been proposed for the modeling of masonry structures, for real masonry structures, it is preferable to use simplified macro-models such as modeling the masonry as a one-phase material (macro-modeling approach) while the use of more sophisticated micro-models is suggested for the modeling of special parts of the masonry structural model. Detailed works on the advantages and disadvantages among different mathematical models about masonry structures can be found in [40,100,101,155,156].…”
Section: Modeling Masonry Using Equivalent Frame Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where fm and m are the compressive stress and strain in masonry respectively, and 'm is the peak strain corresponding to f'm A, B, and C are coefficients describing the shape of the curve, being A= 6.4, B=5.4 and C=1.17 [17]. The Coulomb friction model of the material is considered as follows:…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Experiments On Masonry Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where c is the cohesion, 𝜎 is the normal stress and tan 𝜑 is the friction between the elements. A friction angle 𝜑 equal to 23º was used to define the shear model as recommended in [17,18]. The FE model is discretized considering a mesh formed by 258 rectangular shell elements of 0.18 × 0.28 m 2 and 310 nodes.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Experiments On Masonry Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To make the modelling and capacity assessment of masonry structures even more challenging is the different role played by nonlinear mechanical properties such as strength [4] and fracture energy, as observed in [5][6][7]. Fracture energy plays a crucial role in the post-peak behaviour and displacement capacity of individual URM walls, while its impact is less crucial at larger scales of masonry walls with openings and at building scale [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%