2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale characterization of swine femoral cortical bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…occuring only at very high age in specific organs, since it is known from imaging techniques, such as computerized quantitative contact microradiography [Boivin and Meunier, 2002], quantitative backscattered electron imaging [Roschger et al, 2003], Raman microscopy [Akkus et al, 2003], and Synchroton Micro Computer Tomography [Bossy et al, 2004], that the chemical composition of adult bone matrix (when averaged over a millimeter-sized domain) remains, for a long time, constant throughout specific organs, and in particular with age [Hellmich et al, 2008]. During this time span, measured mechanical properties of the extracellular bone matrix, such as indentation modulus and hardness, appear also as time-invariant [Weaver, 1966;Hoffler et al, 2000;Wolfram et al, 2010;Rho et al, 2002;Burket et al, 2011], while such mechanical properties increase during animal (or human) growth [Feng and Jasiuk, 2011;Weaver, 1966]. It is interesting to discuss the mineral-organics concentration relation of Figure 1 from the viewpoint of cell biology: During growth, the mineral-to-organic mass apposition ratio in extracellular bone tissue is a constant Rabbit bones (BAPN−treated) [Lees et al (1994)] Rabbit bones (Fluoride−treated) [Lees et al (1994)] Rabbit bones (Cortisol−treated) [Lees et al (1994)] Bilinear relation of Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…occuring only at very high age in specific organs, since it is known from imaging techniques, such as computerized quantitative contact microradiography [Boivin and Meunier, 2002], quantitative backscattered electron imaging [Roschger et al, 2003], Raman microscopy [Akkus et al, 2003], and Synchroton Micro Computer Tomography [Bossy et al, 2004], that the chemical composition of adult bone matrix (when averaged over a millimeter-sized domain) remains, for a long time, constant throughout specific organs, and in particular with age [Hellmich et al, 2008]. During this time span, measured mechanical properties of the extracellular bone matrix, such as indentation modulus and hardness, appear also as time-invariant [Weaver, 1966;Hoffler et al, 2000;Wolfram et al, 2010;Rho et al, 2002;Burket et al, 2011], while such mechanical properties increase during animal (or human) growth [Feng and Jasiuk, 2011;Weaver, 1966]. It is interesting to discuss the mineral-organics concentration relation of Figure 1 from the viewpoint of cell biology: During growth, the mineral-to-organic mass apposition ratio in extracellular bone tissue is a constant Rabbit bones (BAPN−treated) [Lees et al (1994)] Rabbit bones (Fluoride−treated) [Lees et al (1994)] Rabbit bones (Cortisol−treated) [Lees et al (1994)] Bilinear relation of Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hierarchical structure has different scales or levels, specific interactions between these levels and a highly complex architecture in order to fulfil bone biological and mechanical functions (Barkaoui and Hambli, 2011;Sergey, 2010). Katz et al and Feng et al (Katz et al,1987;Feng et al, 2010) divide the hierarchical structure into five levels that have been widely accepted in the scientific community: (i) a Nano structural level (ranging from a few nanometres to several hundred nanometres) -bone at this level can be considered as a multi-phase nano-composite material consisting of an organic phase (32 -44% of bone volume), an inorganic phase (33 -43% of bone volume), and water (15 -25% of bone volume); (ii) a Sub-micro-structural level, also called a single lamella level (spanning from one to a few microns); (iii) a Microstructural level (from tens to hundreds of microns), or a single osteon and an interstitial lamella level; (iv) a Meso-structural level (from several hundred microns to several millimetres), or the cortical bone level; and finally, (v) a Macro-structural level, or whole bone level (several millimetres to several centimetres, depending on the species).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only a few 5/44 studies have performed mechanical tests of a single trabecula because the mechanical tests of such small specimens are challenging, as reviewed by Carretta et al (2013a) and Lucchinetti et al (2000). Furthermore, the nanostructural effects on the mechanical properties of a single trabecula have not been investigated and elucidated, although various studies have been conducted on multiscale mechanical characterization in the cortical bone (e.g., Barkaoui et al, 2014;Tadano and Giri, 2011;Feng and Jasiuk, 2011;Gibson et al, 2006;Hoc et al, 2006). Therefore, the present study focused on the mechanical properties of a single trabecula and on the nanostructural effects on its properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%