2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-019-01664-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale habitat requirements of forest bird species in a highly fragmented landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is likely that the environmental factors shaping the species’ occurrence operate at a different resolution than the one used in this study, at least for some species. Indeed, some studies underline that environmental factors act at many different spatial scales (Chiatante et al, 2019; Fischer & Lindenmayer, 2007; Jackson & Fahrig, 2015). Furthermore, in some cases using isolated marginal records can lead to substantial overestimations of niches and, consequently, of geographically suitable areas (Soley‐Guardia et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is likely that the environmental factors shaping the species’ occurrence operate at a different resolution than the one used in this study, at least for some species. Indeed, some studies underline that environmental factors act at many different spatial scales (Chiatante et al, 2019; Fischer & Lindenmayer, 2007; Jackson & Fahrig, 2015). Furthermore, in some cases using isolated marginal records can lead to substantial overestimations of niches and, consequently, of geographically suitable areas (Soley‐Guardia et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected six metrics to characterize the spatial configuration of forest fragments: Area, defined by fragment surface (ha); Shape index, accounting for the edge effect and calculated as the ratio between patch area (ha) and perimeter (m); DNSA, accounting for source area effect and defined by the distance (m) of the fragment from the nearest source area (i.e., the nearest forest fragment with an area higher than 1000 ha, Dondina et al 2017); Isolation FA, accounting for forest isolation and defined by the total amount of forest and poplar plantations cover in a 1-km buffer around the fragment (ha); Isolation NF, accounting for the archipelago effect (Simberloff and Abele 1982;Gotelli 2008) and defined by the number of forest and poplar plantation fragments in a 1-km buffer around the fragment; and Isolation NH, accounting for landscape permeability (Mortelliti et al 2010) and defined by the number of continuous hedgerows in a 1-km buffer around the fragment. We jointly considered forests and poplar plantations to calculate Isolation FA and Isolation NF metrics because poplar plantation can play the role of "soft" matrix elements (sensu Lindenmayer and Fischer 2013) for forest birds (Chiatante et al 2019). We considered the number of continuous hedgerows in the surrounding of fragments because evidence regarding the role of these landscape elements in increasing connectivity for forest birds exist (Bennett et al 2004;Ernoult et al 2006).…”
Section: Nestedness Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is important in identifying the consequence of habitat change on the habitat suitability of the Timor friarbird. This information is the basic knowledge for effective decision-making for habitat conservation (Wauchope-drumm et al 2019;Chiatante et al 2019). This study aims to assess landscape factors that contribute to the habitat suitability of the Timor friarbird and to determine whether the western part of Timor Island is the optimum habitat for the species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%