2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale mechanics and electrical transport in a free-standing 3D architecture of graphene and carbon nanotubes fabricated by pressure assisted welding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, although the isotropic graphite has harder grains, it also has more segregated free volumes (i.e., voids), which cannot hinder sliding of the graphite grains, leading to lower hardness. The hardness of the graphenic glass is also higher than otherwise densified graphene materials including graphene-CNT hybrid solid made by pressure assisted welding 44 , and is comparable to that of the bulk graphene nanoplatelets fabricated by spark plasma sintering 45 . Dense graphene monoliths can be obtained from hydrogels made from hydrothermal reactions, and their size and shape are limited by the volume and shape of the hydrothermal reactors 4648 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast, although the isotropic graphite has harder grains, it also has more segregated free volumes (i.e., voids), which cannot hinder sliding of the graphite grains, leading to lower hardness. The hardness of the graphenic glass is also higher than otherwise densified graphene materials including graphene-CNT hybrid solid made by pressure assisted welding 44 , and is comparable to that of the bulk graphene nanoplatelets fabricated by spark plasma sintering 45 . Dense graphene monoliths can be obtained from hydrogels made from hydrothermal reactions, and their size and shape are limited by the volume and shape of the hydrothermal reactors 4648 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Besides, D‐MXM shows superior mechanical properties as measured by a Hysitron nanoindenter equipped with a Berkovich tip (Figure S10, Supporting Information). An average of ten measurements at various sites gave Young's modulus and hardness values of 15 and 0.7 GPa which are higher than those of carbon‐based monoliths such as graphene/carbon nanotubes (6.5 and 0.18), 3D nanographene (0.3–1 and 0.02–0.1), graphene oxide composites (1.1 and 1.2 × 10 −3 ), 3D graphene foam (1.2 × 10 −3 –1.5 × 10 −3 and 9.1 × 10 −5 –2.6 × 10 −5 ) etc. The Young's modulus was also tested by a resonant ultrasound spectrometer (UMS‐100) and a similar result (12.8 GPa) was obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The recent advent of in situ mechanical testing techniques has opened up a whole new gamut of nanomechanical characterizations . The in situ techniques involve mechanical testing of materials inside a high‐resolution microscope, allowing real‐time observation of deformation behavior.…”
Section: Summary and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%