2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale progressive failure simulation of 3D woven composites under uniaxial tension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, Chamis model was used to determine the elastic constants of impregnated yarns, which is given by Eqn. (9).…”
Section: Analytical Micro-scale Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, Chamis model was used to determine the elastic constants of impregnated yarns, which is given by Eqn. (9).…”
Section: Analytical Micro-scale Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, most of these models were developed for thermoset composites and do not necessarily capture the unique failure mechanisms observed in thermoplastic composites, described in our previous work [5,6]. [18] 2019 3D braided Meso-scale Hashin failure criteria (Meso-scale) Parabolic yield criteria Exponential Madke et al [19] 2019 2D and 3D woven Meso-scale Hashin failure criteria (Meso-scale) None Linear Liu et al [9] 2019 3D angle-interlock Meso-scale Puck failure criteria (Meso-scale) Parabolic yield criteria Exponential Ren et al [20] 2018 3D angle-interlock Meso-scale Hill failure criteria (Meso-scale) von Mises yield criteria Linear Pibo et al [21] 2018 3D angle-interlock Meso-scale Maximum stress (Meso-scale) Maximum stress None Said et al [22] 2018 3D orthogonal Meso-scale Puck failure criteria (Meso-scale) von Mises criteria Linear Turner et al [23] 2016 3D orthogonal Meso-scale Hashin failure criteria (Meso-scale) None Linear Warren et al [24] 2016 3D angle-interlock Meso-scale Hashin failure criteria (Meso-scale) None Exponential Dai et al [25] 2016 3D orthogonal Meso-scale Puck failure criteria (Meso-scale) Maximum stress criteria Linear Zhong et al [26] 2015 3D angle-interlock Meso-scale Puck failure criteria (Meso-scale) Parabolic yield criteria Exponential Zhang et al [27] 2015 2D braided Meso-scale Hashin failure criteria (Meso-scale) None Linear Greens et al [28] In the case of impact modelling of this novel thermoplastic (Elium) based FRC, Kinvi et al [30] and Kazemi et al [29] used a homogenization technique to model the response of 2D woven composite at a macroscale, where each woven layer was modelled as an orthotropic material. The authors' used maximum stress failure criteria and the nonlinear response was induced using pseudo-plastic law, i.e., by fitting the experimental shear response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The curved geometric unit mainly contains the curved fiber tows, and the proportion of fiber tows could be adjusted adaptively to suit the unit size. To analyze the properties of the curved fiber tows, the cross-sectional shape was supposed to be circular, 29 elliptical, 30,31 runway, 32 polygon, 33 and convex lens. 34 No matter what the shape changes, the cross-sectional area remains unchanged.…”
Section: The Curved Geometric Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2007) then developed an exponential damage evolution equations controlled by material fracture toughness for composite laminates based on the Crack Band Theory. Meanwhile, the progressive damage of the 3 D braided composites has been examined by using linear damage evolution equation (Ge et al., 2018; He et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019) and exponential damage evolution equation (Ai et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2019; Zheng et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2015). Although much investigation has been conducted on the progressive damage modeling and numerical analysis of various 3 D woven composites, most of the damage models are established at yarn level, regard the yarns as homogenized material and failure criterion for unidirectional laminates are adopted as damage initiation criterion, which ignores the non-uniformity of the yarns that are composed of fibers and bonded matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%