2006
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1191:mrsbeb]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Scale Roost-Site Selection by Evening Bats on Pine-Dominated Landscapes in Southwest Georgia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We plotted points in the GIS, calculated the maximum distance traveled between two successive locations for each bat, and then determined mean maximum travel distance for each species. To identify available habitat types within the range of roosting bats, we defined a study area by creating a 100% minimum convex polygon (MCP) for each species using all roost locations and buffering this with mean maximum travel distance moved by that species (Miles et al, 2006). Within the boundary of the buffered MCP, we generated a random point for every roost location, replacing any random points that fell on non-USFS property.…”
Section: Stand and Landscape-scale Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We plotted points in the GIS, calculated the maximum distance traveled between two successive locations for each bat, and then determined mean maximum travel distance for each species. To identify available habitat types within the range of roosting bats, we defined a study area by creating a 100% minimum convex polygon (MCP) for each species using all roost locations and buffering this with mean maximum travel distance moved by that species (Miles et al, 2006). Within the boundary of the buffered MCP, we generated a random point for every roost location, replacing any random points that fell on non-USFS property.…”
Section: Stand and Landscape-scale Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection typically is assessed through comparisons of day-roosts to other trees (hereafter ''non-roosts'') on the landscape, either by random selection or examination of potentially available day-roosts assumed to be unoccupied. Non-roosts used for comparison historically have been those measured in radius plots (Lacki and Schwierjohann, 2001), belt transects (Ford et al, 2006;Silvis et al, 2012) or are paired randomly selected trees (Johnson et al, 2009;Miles et al, 2006;Perry and Thill, 2007). Statistical analysis of selection generally is conducted using a set of candidate models representing combinations of measured tree and/or landscape characteristics that may distinguish day-roosts from non-roosts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because males of many cavity-roosting forest bats typically roost alone whereas females roost in colonies during summer (e.g., Broders and Forbes, 2004;Miles et al, 2006), sex-specific differences in roost selection might be expected for those species. However, potential differences in roost selection between sexes of Lasiurus (which typically roost alone) are not obvious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%