2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale second-order computational homogenization of multi-phase materials: a nested finite element solution strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
434
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 588 publications
(448 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
434
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…as for example pointed out in [34,43,44]. In this context, the symbols "+" and "−" in the latter condition denote opposing edges of the underlying RVE.…”
Section: Finite Element Discretisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as for example pointed out in [34,43,44]. In this context, the symbols "+" and "−" in the latter condition denote opposing edges of the underlying RVE.…”
Section: Finite Element Discretisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (35) is satisfied automatically if the periodic constraints (24) and (27) are satisfied either by using the constraint elimination method or by using the Lagrange multipliers method, in which case the multipliers represent the boundary forces. In a finite element analysis, the discrete constraints created from these periodic boundary conditions are easily obtained when using conformal meshes [4,7,8,9]. In a more general setting, the conformity of mesh distributions on opposite boundaries of the representative volume element cannot always be guaranteed, leading to a non-periodic mesh.…”
Section: Problem At the Microscopic Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective remedy, which is known as the computational homogenization, has been developed to link up straightforwardly the responses of the large scale problems, also called the macroscopic problems, to the behavior of the smaller scale problems, also called the microscopic problems, where the presence of heterogeneities is considered. The basic ideas of the computational homogenization approach have been presented in papers by Michel et al [1], Terada et al [2], Miehe et al [3,4], Kouznetsova et al [5,6,7], Kaczmarczyk et al [8], Peric et al [9], Geers et al [10] and references therein, as a non-exhaustive list. By this technique, two boundary value problems are defined at two separate scales, Figure 1: Illustration of first-order and second-order multiscale computational homogenization schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assumption is particularly valid when macrogradients remain small and material failure does not occur. The second-order computational homogenization partly alleviates the assumption of scale separation by taking the gradient of the macrodeformation gradient tensor into account [246][247][248][249][250]. Furthermore, second-order computational homogenization introduces a physical length to the microscale that is missing in the first-order homogenization.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%