2019
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-sector approximation method for arteries: the residual stresses of circumferential rings with non-trivial openings

Abstract: The opening angle method is a popular choice in biomechanics to estimate residual stresses in arteries. Experimentally, it means that an artery is cut into rings; then the rings are cut axially or radially allowing them to open into sectors; then the corresponding opening angles are measured to give residual stress levels by solving an inverse problem. However, for many tissues, for example in pathological tissues, the ring does not open according to the theory into a neat single circular sector, but rather cr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Needless to say, this is not always true, particularly in opening angle studies of arteries, where a single cut of an arterial ring can have a non-uniform curvature. 25 In addition, with the cylindrical assumption, we cannot model the experimental observation that opening angles are location-dependent, with higher values at heart apex. 21 Indeed, the ''true'' residual stress can only be achieved through infinite cuts using the opening angle method, which is not practical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Needless to say, this is not always true, particularly in opening angle studies of arteries, where a single cut of an arterial ring can have a non-uniform curvature. 25 In addition, with the cylindrical assumption, we cannot model the experimental observation that opening angles are location-dependent, with higher values at heart apex. 21 Indeed, the ''true'' residual stress can only be achieved through infinite cuts using the opening angle method, which is not practical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work takes as reference the study by Rivera et al (2020) , which consists of the passive mechanical characterization of the aortic artery of lambs born and raised under conditions of chronic hypoxia (3,600 m above sea level) with and without melatonin application. As the subject of analysis, emphasis is placed on a specific sample of the abdominal zone of a control group lamb (33 days old and 9.1 kg weight at the time of euthanasia with injection of sodium thiopental, 100 mg kg −1 ), whose stress-free configuration (after the ring-opening test) presented a highly variable curvature, so that the geometric assumptions of the most widely used methodologies ( Chuong and Fung, 1986 ; Sigaeva et al, 2019 ) lose representativeness of the physical phenomenon.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the hypothesis was successfully verified, the geometry changes exhibited within each segment, such as curvature differences, were not analyzed. Sigaeva et al (2019) has proposed a method that consists of assessing the non-uniform geometries with a multi-sector approximation, in which the entire ring shape is mathematically discretized into different arc sectors, calculating the stretches and stresses in each one of them, with both theoretical and numerical approaches. Ohayon et al (2007) have investigated the effects of residual strains and stresses in tissues with vulnerable plaque, using patient-specific geometries produced by the opened shape of the diseased tissues to evaluate the stress field using a finite element analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in 2019 and 2021, respectively, Sigaeva et al. ( 2019 ) and Lefloch et al. ( 2021 ) developed novel ways of assessing residual strains without this perfect circle assumption to make the measurement of tissue rings more accurate, particularly when the tissue being investigated is diseased (as these specimens are often more irregular compared to healthy tissue).…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%