2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2718101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Sensor Data Fusion for High-Resolution Material Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of advances in NDE have been ongoing, although no single NDE method is likely to be sensitive to all degradation mechanisms of interest in advanced reactors. In addition, in proposed AdvSMR designs, degradation may occur at different locations, have different causes and growth rates, and consequently may require a number of different measurement methods to ensure overall detection reliability (Gros 1997;Dion et al 2007). Details of conventional and advanced techniques, and research on sensors for harsh environments that may be leveraged for use in PHM, are available in a number of previous reports in this series (Meyer et al 2010;Meyer et al 2011;).…”
Section: Nondestructive Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of advances in NDE have been ongoing, although no single NDE method is likely to be sensitive to all degradation mechanisms of interest in advanced reactors. In addition, in proposed AdvSMR designs, degradation may occur at different locations, have different causes and growth rates, and consequently may require a number of different measurement methods to ensure overall detection reliability (Gros 1997;Dion et al 2007). Details of conventional and advanced techniques, and research on sensors for harsh environments that may be leveraged for use in PHM, are available in a number of previous reports in this series (Meyer et al 2010;Meyer et al 2011;).…”
Section: Nondestructive Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the work to date has focused on the fusion being performed at the signal level, using similar forms of measurements (for instance, image data), with little effort being expended on fusing dissimilar forms (such as fusing image data with time-4.9 series measurements). These have tended to focus on fusing information at a higher level after the measurement data has been processed and a diagnostic result obtained from each of the measurement sources (Dion et al 2007). These techniques are largely data-driven and require data sets from known sources to determine the parameters of the fusion algorithm.…”
Section: Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include the use of wavelet decomposition to fuse ultrasound C-scans with optical images of barely visible impact damage in polymer-matrix composites as demonstrated by Katunin et al; or, the use of supervised and unsupervised learning techniques in fusing NDE of concrete structures as demonstrated by Cotič et al 14,15 Researchers like Dion et al and Kahrobaee have also used multimodal data fusion to improve bulk characterization of microstructure properties, such as determining the processing conditions in as-manufactured parts or the volume percent of ferrite in dual phase steels 16,17 . Yet, only recently has fusion of NDE modalities for materials characterization at the microscale been demonstrated [18][19][20][21][22] .…”
Section: The Role Of Data Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%