2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9484-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Stakeholder Labour Monitoring Organizations: Egoists, Instrumentalists, or Moralists?

Abstract: codes of conduct, ethical cultures, FLA, labour, maquilas, monitoring organizations, SAI, stakeholders, transparency, WRAP, WRC,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The configurational approach of the framework also illustrates the complex dynamics of interpreting CSR behavior, and shows that a unidimensional approach, such as the egoism versus other-directed one is incomplete, also noted by Brickson (2007). The egoism approach has been designated 'individually self-interested to fully other regarding' (Jones et al, 2007) and 'egoist-instrumentalist-moralist' (Everett et al, 2008). In effect, these continuums are versions of the separation hypothesis (Freeman, 1999) of instrumental versus normative, or selfish versus unselfish, without recognizing that both can exist together, intertwined with a number of other dimensions to create the character and identity of an organization.…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The configurational approach of the framework also illustrates the complex dynamics of interpreting CSR behavior, and shows that a unidimensional approach, such as the egoism versus other-directed one is incomplete, also noted by Brickson (2007). The egoism approach has been designated 'individually self-interested to fully other regarding' (Jones et al, 2007) and 'egoist-instrumentalist-moralist' (Everett et al, 2008). In effect, these continuums are versions of the separation hypothesis (Freeman, 1999) of instrumental versus normative, or selfish versus unselfish, without recognizing that both can exist together, intertwined with a number of other dimensions to create the character and identity of an organization.…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although many MSIs have set up governance structures that are supposed to enable equal participation of stakeholder groups, many studies show that these structures are seldom enacted in practice. Scholarly work in this area unveils how everyday problems, such as language barriers, access to financial resources, and lack of expert knowledge, challenge the inclusiveness of MSIs (Cheyns, 2014;Everett et al, 2008; • MSIs coexist because standards-setters can differentiate themselves despite the existence of similarities. • In many cases, coexistence of (certificationbased) MSIs is problematic as it is likely to cause a regulatory "race to the bottom" and undermines institutionalization processes by fragmenting markets for sustainable products.…”
Section: Input Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durability influences the perceived salience and we propose adding it to the general stakeholder model because agri-food cooperatives build codes in a way that reflects their economic and moral interests [25]. In companies with ongoing relationships in their environment based on moral codes, durable stakeholders can become very important for managers when making decisions because of the ongoing relationship and demands.…”
Section: Durabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%