2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-017-1394-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-step water quality forecasting using a boosting ensemble multi-wavelet extreme learning machine model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study showed a greater overall performance of hybrid wavelet transformed ELM (WA-ELM) model as compared to the ELM model. Using a boosting ensemble multi-wavelet extreme learning machine (Multi-WA-ELM) model improved water quality forecasting as compared to individual WA-ELM and ELM models [BARZEGAR et al 2017].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study showed a greater overall performance of hybrid wavelet transformed ELM (WA-ELM) model as compared to the ELM model. Using a boosting ensemble multi-wavelet extreme learning machine (Multi-WA-ELM) model improved water quality forecasting as compared to individual WA-ELM and ELM models [BARZEGAR et al 2017].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the Lunj-Box test for the non-correlation hypothesis does not reject, using up to 30 different lags in all the locations under study, and Figure 4 presents the histograms of the residuals that resemble the normal curve. 9.599 0.00 0.00 9.983 0.00 0.00 9.673 0.00 0.00 9.559 0.00 0.00 9.532 0.00 0.00 β 3 9.212 0.00 0.00 9.546 0.00 0.00 9.138 0.00 0.00 9.504 0.00 0.00 9.737 0.00 0.00 β 4 8.753 0.00 0.00 9.001 0.00 0.00 9.356 0.00 0.00 9.134 0.00 0.00 9.014 0.00 0.00 β 5 8.313 0.00 0.00 9.262 0.00 0.00 8.555 0.00 0.00 8.688 0.00 0.00 8.753 0.00 0.00 β 6 8.362 0.00 0.00 7.771 0.00 0.00 7.270 0.00 0.00 7.847 0.00 0.00 7.939 0.00 0.00 β 7 7.273 0.00 0.00 8.164 0.00 0.00 7.271 0.00 0.00 8.576 0.00 0.00 8.376 0.00 0.00 β 8 7.087 0.00 0.00 8.844 0.00 0.00 6.556 0.00 0.00 7.668 0.00 0.00 8.260 0.00 0.00 β 9 7.971 0.00 0.00 7.941 0.00 0.00 5.800 0.00 0.00 7.166 0.00 0.00 7.319 0.00 0.00 β 10 7.410 0.00 0.00 7.844 0.00 0.00 7.673 0.00 0.00 7.561 0.00 0.00 8.477 0.00 0.00 β 11 8.030 0.00 0.00 8.968 0.00 0.00 9.737 0.00 0.00 9.673 0.00 0.00 9.408 0.00 0.00 β 12 9.859 0.00 0.00 9.946 0.00 0.00 9.418 0.00 0.00 9.025 0.00 0.00 9.207 0.00 0.00 Furthermore, with the exception of the CAR location, the residuals of the calibration model do not reject (at a 1% significance level) the normality assumption using the Jarque-Bera test or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; the K-S p-values are presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], generalized additive models of location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) were applied to characterize model uncertainty, due to incomplete understanding of physical processes, in an Atlantic coastal plain watershed system. In [7], extreme learning machine (ELM) and wavelet-extreme learning machine hybrid (WA-ELM) models were applied to forecast multi-step-ahead electrical conductivity (EC)-a water quality indicator that is useful for estimating the mineralization and salinity of water-and to employ an integrated method to combine the advantages of WA-ELM models, which utilized the boosting ensemble method. Control charts were developed by [8] to treat the case of a French river, for which the parameter of interest, the dissolved oxygen concentration (DO), was characterized by a non-stationary and seasonal time evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an aggregated multiwavelet forecast without treating their models probabilistically nor studying the reliability of the forecasts (such as in Alizadeh, Jafari Nodoushan, et al (2017); Barzegar, Asghari Moghaddam, Adamowski, et al (2018), Barzegar et al (2017)).…”
Section: Water Resources Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%