Multi-strategic intervention to enhance implementation of healthy canteen policy: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundInternationally, governments have implemented school-based nutrition policies to restrict the availability of unhealthy foods from sale. The aim of the trial was to assess the effectiveness of a multi-strategic intervention to increase implementation of a state-wide healthy canteen policy. The impact of the intervention on the energy, total fat, and sodium of children’s canteen purchases and on schools’ canteen revenue was also assessed.MethodsAustralian primary schools with a canteen were randomised to receive a 12–14-month, multi-strategic intervention or to a no intervention control group. The intervention sought to increase implementation of a state-wide healthy canteen policy which required schools to remove unhealthy items (classified as ‘red’ or ‘banned’) from regular sale and encouraged schools to ‘fill the menu’ with healthy items (classified as ‘green’). The intervention strategies included allocation of a support officer to assist with policy implementation, engagement of school principals and parent committees, consensus processes with canteen managers, training, provision of tools and resources, academic detailing, performance feedback, recognition and marketing initiatives. Data were collected at baseline (April to September, 2013) and at completion of the implementation period (November, 2014 to April, 2015).ResultsSeventy schools participated in the trial. Relative to control, at follow-up, intervention schools were significantly more likely to have menus without ‘red’ or ‘banned’ items (RR = 21.11; 95% CI 3.30 to 147.28; p ≤ 0.01) and to have at least 50% of menu items classified as ‘green’ (RR = 3.06; 95% CI 1.64 to 5.68; p ≤ 0.01). At follow-up, student purchases from intervention school canteens were significantly lower in total fat (difference = −1.51 g; 95% CI −2.84 to −0.18; p = 0.028) compared to controls, but not in energy (difference = −132.32 kJ; 95% CI −280.99 to 16.34; p = 0.080) or sodium (difference = −46.81 mg; 95% CI −96.97 to 3.35; p = 0.067). Canteen revenue did not differ significantly between groups.ConclusionPoor implementation of evidence-based school nutrition policies is a problem experienced by governments internationally, and one with significant implications for public health. The study makes an important contribution to the limited experimental evidence regarding strategies to improve implementation of school nutrition policies and suggests that, with multi-strategic support, implementation of healthy canteen policies can be achieved in most schools.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12613000311752)

Barriers to implementation of a healthy canteen policy: A survey using the theoretical domains framework

“…Recruitment was conducted among all primary schools (enrolling children aged 5‐12 years) in the study region identified via health service record as having an operational canteen (n = 338). Schools were ineligible if they catered for students with special needs, juvenile justice or hospitalised children or if they were involved in trials conducted by the research team …”

Two‐year follow‐up of a randomised controlled trial to assess the sustainability of a school intervention to improve the implementation of a school‐based nutrition policy

“…To bridge this evidence‐practice gap, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in one region of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The trial aimed to increase the implementation of the mandatory state canteen policy Fresh Tastes @ School NSW Healthy School Canteen Strategy (hereafter referred to as Fresh Tastes @ School).…”

“…The trial aimed to increase the implementation of the mandatory state canteen policy Fresh Tastes @ School NSW Healthy School Canteen Strategy (hereafter referred to as Fresh Tastes @ School). At intervention completion (12 months post baseline), schools receiving implementation support were significantly more likely to adhere to the policy . Although the findings are encouraging, the benefits of implementation support strategies are maximised if their effects are maintained in the long term.…”

From demonstration project to changes in health systems for child obesity prevention: the legacy of ‘Good for Kids, Good for Life’

“…>80% of schools and childcare services), led to significant improvements in the adoption of policies and practices across community settings, improved student dietary intake and physical activity, and reduced population prevalence of child obesity by 1% per year against an otherwise increasing prevalence in the rest of the state. 10 These successful interventions and implementation support strategies have subsequently been adopted as routine service delivery practice by HNELHD in supporting 420 primary schools and 350 childcare services to promote healthy eating and physical activity. These implementation trials were among the first of their kind and contributed an early and substantive body of evidence to an emerging field of implementation science in community settings.…”

“…3,4 Rigorous controlled evaluations of the service delivery models provided evidence for 'how' community settings could be re-oriented to more effectively deliver obesity prevention services at scale. 10 At a NSW level, GfK provided evidence for achieving state-wide impact at a time of significant national and state investment through the National Partnership Agreement Editorial on Preventive Health. 5,6 Evidence generated from GfK had a profound impact on population health services locally and in NSW.…”