2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-subject atlas-based auto-segmentation reduces interobserver variation and improves dosimetric parameter consistency for organs at risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multi-institution clinical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For OHP, reported results are 0.4–0.6 and 1–1.25mm [16], 0.64 [17] and our results are 0.58 and 2.6mm. This object is very challenging due to lack of contrast with surrounding muscles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For OHP, reported results are 0.4–0.6 and 1–1.25mm [16], 0.64 [17] and our results are 0.58 and 2.6mm. This object is very challenging due to lack of contrast with surrounding muscles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For LX, reported results are 0.86 [5], 0.5–0.62 and 2.0–6.0mm [16], 0.73 [17]. Our results are 0.74 and 4.0mm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Researchers also studied the performance of machine learning algorithms such as k‐nearest neighbors and support vector machines trained on intensity, gradient, texture contrast, texture homogeneity, texture energy, cluster tendency, Gabor and Sobel features . The above mentioned algorithms covered the complete set of OARs in the HaN region including brainstem, cerebellum, spinal cord, mandible, parotid glan‐ds, submandibular glands, pituitary gland, thyroid, eye globes, eye lenses, optic nerves, optic chiasm, larynx, pharyngeal constrictor muscle, pterygoid muscles, tongue muscles, and lymph nodes . Despite the considerable attention, the demonstrated results are still not satisfactory for the clinical usage and automated methods cannot accurately segment OARs in the presence of tumors and severe pathologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The great discrepancy was confirmed by the percentage of intersection that ranged between 32 and 89 %, with a mean value of As previously said, the interobserver variability in OARs definition can be limited. Recently, Tao et al [34] conducted a study to assess whether consensus guideline-based atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS) reduces interobserver variation and improves dosimetric parameter consistency for OARs in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, showing a significant interobserver variation for all OARs in manual contouring. Edited ABAS reduced interobserver variation and improved dosimetric parameter consistency, particularly for some structures, such as larynx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%