1987
DOI: 10.1016/0143-974x(87)90002-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-surface model application to beam-columns subjected to cyclic loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several practical applications it may be convenient and adequate to model the material response for SSs by means of uniaxial stress–strain relationships of the Petersson and Popov multi‐surface formulation23,24. The latter employs a mixed isotropic and kinematic hardening rule and has been successfully adopted for several studies25,26. Its main advantage with respect to other simplified models, such as bilinear with or without hardening, was observed particularly in the large strain cyclic amplitudes.…”
Section: Stainless Steelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several practical applications it may be convenient and adequate to model the material response for SSs by means of uniaxial stress–strain relationships of the Petersson and Popov multi‐surface formulation23,24. The latter employs a mixed isotropic and kinematic hardening rule and has been successfully adopted for several studies25,26. Its main advantage with respect to other simplified models, such as bilinear with or without hardening, was observed particularly in the large strain cyclic amplitudes.…”
Section: Stainless Steelsmentioning
confidence: 99%