2020
DOI: 10.23919/jsee.2020.000066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-target tracking algorithm based on PHD filter against multi-range-false-target jamming

Abstract: Multi-range-false-target (MRFT) jamming is particularly challenging for tracking radar due to the dense clutter and the repeated multiple false targets. The conventional association-based multi-target tracking (MTT) methods suffer from high computational complexity and limited usage in the presence of MRFT jamming. In order to solve the above problems, an efficient and adaptable probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter is proposed. Based on the gating strategy, the obtained measurements are firstly classifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially, since cognitive radar technology gradually became a research hotspot in the field, the demand for real-time perception and fine characterization of radar clutter environment has become more and more urgent. The refined characterization of radar clutter is represented by its corresponding optimal selection of radar clutter model, which has a profound impact on cognitive waveform design [19], constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detection [20], multi-target tracking [21], and target recognition under clutter background [22]. Different from the previous environmental attribute classification based on clutter features, clutter model for real radar data does not have an objective label in hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, since cognitive radar technology gradually became a research hotspot in the field, the demand for real-time perception and fine characterization of radar clutter environment has become more and more urgent. The refined characterization of radar clutter is represented by its corresponding optimal selection of radar clutter model, which has a profound impact on cognitive waveform design [19], constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detection [20], multi-target tracking [21], and target recognition under clutter background [22]. Different from the previous environmental attribute classification based on clutter features, clutter model for real radar data does not have an objective label in hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature with respect to T/R-R radar multi-target matching are few. The current multi-target pairing methods mainly focus on the track association of target [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the scenario of dense clutter, an improved SMC‐PHD algorithm for MTT problem is proposed by Chen et al. to deal with multi‐range‐false‐target jamming [31]. By propagating the posterior intensity of each sensor at prediction step, the iterated‐corrector probability hypothesis density (IC‐PHD) algorithm is proposed by Liu et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the unknown process noise and measurement noise, a robust adaptive PHD filter is proposed by Gu et al to address the degradation of PHD performance, which introduces the inverse Wishart distribution to model the prior distribution of process noise and measurement noise [30]. Under the scenario of dense clutter, an improved SMC-PHD algorithm for MTT problem is proposed by Chen et al to deal with multi-range-false-target jamming [31]. By propagating the posterior intensity of each sensor at prediction step, the iterated-corrector probability hypothesis density (IC-PHD) algorithm is proposed by Liu et al to improve the tracking accuracy [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%