2020 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iceic49074.2020.9051305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-task Deep Learning for Colon Cancer Grading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A histology image viewed at high magnification (typically 20x or 40x) can reveal millions of subtle cellular features, and deep CNN models are exceptionally good at extracting features from high-resolution image data [ 82 ]. Automating cancer grading with histology-based deep CNNs has proven successful, with studies showing that performance of deep CNNs can be comparable with pathologists in grading prostate [ 40 42 ], breast [ 43 ], colon cancer [ 44 ] and lymphoma [ 45 ]. Explainability methods can enable and improve histology-based classification models by allowing pathologists to validate DL-generated predictions.…”
Section: Deep Learning In Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A histology image viewed at high magnification (typically 20x or 40x) can reveal millions of subtle cellular features, and deep CNN models are exceptionally good at extracting features from high-resolution image data [ 82 ]. Automating cancer grading with histology-based deep CNNs has proven successful, with studies showing that performance of deep CNNs can be comparable with pathologists in grading prostate [ 40 42 ], breast [ 43 ], colon cancer [ 44 ] and lymphoma [ 45 ]. Explainability methods can enable and improve histology-based classification models by allowing pathologists to validate DL-generated predictions.…”
Section: Deep Learning In Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They stated that they used DenseNET121 and obtained an accuracy of 85.91%. 16 Sitnik et al in their study stated that they found a trivial difference in performance between deep classifiers trained from scrape and corresponding classifiers previously trained on off-field image datasets, and showed that the best micro-balanced accuracy predicted by the U-NET ++ classifier in the independent test set was equal to 89.34%. F1 score and sensitivity were 83.67% and 81.11%, respectively.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the GoogLeNet CNN gives higher performance (0.99 f1-score) than the shallow CNN (0.92 f1-score). The use of multi-task DL for colon cancer grading has been demonstrated by (Vuong et al, 2020) with a neural network consisting of DenseNet121 and two consecutive fully connected layers (classification and regression layers). Regression is applied to predict the values of a desired target quantity when the target quantity is continuous.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%