SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2020 2020
DOI: 10.1190/segam2020-3426539.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-task learning based P/S wave separation and reverse time migration for VSP

Abstract: P/S wave mode separation is an essential tool for single-mode analysis from multi-component seismic data. Wave separation methods in recorded data require expert knowledge to choose parameters in different shots of data. To make this process automatic, we propose a machine learning-based method to separate P/S waves. This method employs a multi-task neural network that extracts P-and S-potential simultaneously from multi-component VSP data. Targeting at a specific testing dataset, we derive an efficient buildi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, many achievements have emerged in the research of wave field separation [18][19][20], and different methods have been adopted according to different data types and application directions. For example, the P-wave and S-wave separation of multi-wave seismic data are generally based on the kinematic characteristics (wave velocity, vibration direction) and dynamic characteristics (wave amplitude, frequency, and phase) of seismic waves, mainly the F-K filtering τ-P transform, Radon transform, polarization filtering, full waveform inversion, divergence, and curl methods [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many achievements have emerged in the research of wave field separation [18][19][20], and different methods have been adopted according to different data types and application directions. For example, the P-wave and S-wave separation of multi-wave seismic data are generally based on the kinematic characteristics (wave velocity, vibration direction) and dynamic characteristics (wave amplitude, frequency, and phase) of seismic waves, mainly the F-K filtering τ-P transform, Radon transform, polarization filtering, full waveform inversion, divergence, and curl methods [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have applied MTL to solve practical geophysical problems such as seismic image processing (Wu, Liang, Shi, Geng, et al, 2019), P/S wave separation and reverse time migration for vertical seismic profiling (VSP) (Y. Wei et al, 2020), super-resolution of seismic velocity model (Li et al, 2020), seismic structural curvature volume extraction (Ao et al, 2020) and seismic inversion (Meng et al, 2022;Zheng et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, training data are insufficient to train an accurate network, and the shared training data and parameters of MTL play a role in data augmentation (Y. Zhang & Yang, 2021). Many researchers have applied MTL to solve practical geophysical problems such as seismic image processing (Wu, Liang, Shi, Geng, et al., 2019), P/S wave separation and reverse time migration for vertical seismic profiling (VSP) (Y. Wei et al., 2020), super‐resolution of seismic velocity model (Li et al., 2020), seismic structural curvature volume extraction (Ao et al., 2020) and seismic inversion (Meng et al., 2022; Wang, Wang, et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the application of deep learning methods [21] in the fields of geophysics and applied geophysics has received great attention and promising achievements, such as detecting faults [22,23], classifying facies [24,25], attenuating noise [26,27], picking first arrivals [28,29], building velocity models [30,31] and reconstructing seismic data [32,33]. Inspired by deep learning methods, some scholars have proposed many effective separation and decomposition methods of P-and S-wave modes from the coupled elastic seismic wavefields based on different neural networks, such as multi-task learning [34], convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [35,36], generative adversarial networks (GANs) [37,38] and deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) [39], and these methods are intelligent datadriven algorithms for the separation and decomposition of P-and S-wave modes which are not dependent on elastic model parameters and certain prior conditions. However, these above methods mainly use the corresponding neural networks to separate two decoupled scalar P-and S-wave modes from the coupled elastic seismic wavefields, and therefore cannot obtain all the horizontal and vertical components of the decomposed vector P-and S-wave modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%