2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-technique analysis of high quality HPHT diamond crystal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 The literature describing several structural defects is often based on Raman spectroscopy, 3 X-ray diffraction, 4 and cathodoluminescence 5 techniques. More rarely, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been employed, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] due to the remarkable hardness of diamond, which makes the specimen preparation more difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The literature describing several structural defects is often based on Raman spectroscopy, 3 X-ray diffraction, 4 and cathodoluminescence 5 techniques. More rarely, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been employed, [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] due to the remarkable hardness of diamond, which makes the specimen preparation more difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the doping level in diamond, usually secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) [29,30] or cathodoluminescence [31,32] are used. However, these are very heavy experiments and recently, V. Mortet et al propose a simpler way to obtain the boron doping level in diamond: Raman spectroscopy, which is a fast and appropriate contactless characterization method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diamond yields to breakage at these cleavage planes. 10, 11 This feature of differential hardness makes the diamond a unique tool material candidate in ultra-precision machining. In multiple diamond applications (of shearing, cleaving, and machining), their crystal geometry and hardness feature predominantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure11. Average and standard deviation data; roughness (Ra in nm) with tool-2; UPD tools versus CFT tool.Note: X-axis: UPD tools for progressive SPDT of PDPCs; Y-axis: roughness (Ra in nm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%