Inclusion of students with "disabilities" in public systems of general education has been a global initiative since the Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action by the UN General Assembly in 1994. Despite global and national policy efforts the practice has been sporadic and elusive. Framing education as categorical, specialized service delivery to discrete populations makes inclusion an unsolvable problem. The advent of multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) coupled with universal design for learning (UDL) practices delivered in whole-school rather than classroom-based formats poses a pathway out of the conundrum by framing public education as a system of equitable distribution of resources such as services and supports based on measured and monitored need on the part of all students. Potentially supportive research literature is reviewed.
Key Words: EQUITY; INCLUSION; MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT; SYSTEMS CHANGE, UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNINGSWIFT Center produced the data for this paper under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs Grant No. H326Y120005. OSEP Project Officers Grace Zamora Durán and Tina Diamond served as the project officers. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this publication is intended or should be inferred.
EQUITY-BASED INCLUSIVE SYSTEMS CHANGE 1
Equity as a Basis for Inclusive Education Systems ChangeRittel and Webber (1973) wrote "The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail, because of the nature of these problems. They are 'wicked' problems, whereas science has developed to deal with 'tame problems'" (p. 155). The social professions (e.g., education) have evolved as conduits for application of scientific knowledge from their respective disciplines (e.g., psychology). As such, they assume responsibility for planning functions and guidance in formulation of social policy. Yet the relationship of knowledge production (science) to applications (profession) breaks down in the face of wicked problems. A problem is wicked, in Rittel and Webber's terms, when its solution is bound up in its formulation and the context of the problem militates against its formulation. Within different professional groupings are people with different values, epistemological preferences, and so on, and solutions for social policy problems become caught up in the conflicts among them.Knowledge production proceeds apace in support of all solutions until one prevails. New solutions to old wicked problems may result in the overthrow of prevalent paradigms (Kuhn, 1970;Skrtic, 1993)."Inclusion" of students with "disabilities" in general education arrangements fits the definition of a wicked problem. The significance of this problem rests in the current values underpinning a large slice of international social policy in education, whic...