2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-type clustering and classification from heterogeneous networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For future work, we aim to introduce the possibility to handle mixed-types attributes (i.e., not only numerical attributes). Moreover, we plan to extend the proposed approach in order to make it able to solve classification tasks as well to measure and explicitly (8,16,24,32)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For future work, we aim to introduce the possibility to handle mixed-types attributes (i.e., not only numerical attributes). Moreover, we plan to extend the proposed approach in order to make it able to solve classification tasks as well to measure and explicitly (8,16,24,32)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peculiarities of data in such application domains further motivate the adoption of the predictive clustering framework in this paper. Indeed, not only several studies in the literature proved the effectiveness of predictive clustering frameworks [6,[14][15][16], but it has shown to be particularly appropriate when data exhibit different forms of autocorrelation [17], i.e., objects which are close to each other (spatially, temporally, or in a network) appear more related than distant objects. Such phenomena are commonly present in data regarding the cited domains and approaches based on clustering can naturally detect them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the previous studies focus on the networks' structure, and others use unlabeled objects for classification [15][16][17]. Collective classification [18] is one of the most popular classification methods in mining networks. These methods classify objects by their features and the structure of the network in the homogeneous information networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the heterogeneous network is explored to measure the relatedness of heterogeneous objects. Pio et al [31] introduced heterogeneous networks with an arbitrary structure to evaluate its performance for both clustering and classification tasks. Serafino et al [32] proposed an ensemble learning approach to classify objects of different classes, which is based on the heterogeneous networks for extracting both correlation and autocorrelation that involve the observed objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%