1997
DOI: 10.1080/014311697218962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-variate optimal speckle reduction in SAR imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this stage, the equivalent number of looks (ENL) is approximately 4.4. In order to increase this ENL, which is insufficient for most applications, we applied a multi-image filter, which decreases the speckle effect while preserving the spatial resolution of the images [24,25]. A 3 × 3 spatial window was chosen, and each image was filtered only with the images acquired before its own acquisition date, in order to simulate the NRT conditions.…”
Section: Sentinel-1 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, the equivalent number of looks (ENL) is approximately 4.4. In order to increase this ENL, which is insufficient for most applications, we applied a multi-image filter, which decreases the speckle effect while preserving the spatial resolution of the images [24,25]. A 3 × 3 spatial window was chosen, and each image was filtered only with the images acquired before its own acquisition date, in order to simulate the NRT conditions.…”
Section: Sentinel-1 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each image was cropped and superposed on the Sentinel-2 tiles. A multi-temporal speckle filter [28] was preferred to the more classical spatial filter in order to preserve spatial resolution and the fine structure of Sentinel-1 images. As shown previously in [29,30], this method produces images with reduced speckle effects from the whole sentinel-1 acquisition time series (30 dates since February 2015) and multi-polarized (VH and VV) images.…”
Section: Sentinel-1 and 2 Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PALSAR SLC Level 1.1 images were multi-look processed to 4-looks [49] corresponding to 12.5 m pixel spacing (~70 × 70 km area coverage) using the SARScape "image processing workbench" module within ENVI [50,51]. These were then speckle filtered using a Gamma MAP filter [52] with a 5 × 5-pixel window, radiometrically calibrated and normalized by eliminating incidence angle effects and antenna gain and spread loss patterns.…”
Section: Palsarmentioning
confidence: 99%