2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00843-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-view 3D skin feature recognition and localization for patient tracking in spinal surgery applications

Abstract: Background Minimally invasive spine surgery is dependent on accurate navigation. Computer-assisted navigation is increasingly used in minimally invasive surgery (MIS), but current solutions require the use of reference markers in the surgical field for both patient and instruments tracking. Purpose To improve reliability and facilitate clinical workflow, this study proposes a new marker-free tracking framework based on skin feature recognition. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adhesive skin markers are used by the augmented reality surgical navigation system (ARSN) commercially known as ClarifEye (Philips, Best, The Netherlands), while Spine Mask (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) utilizes LED lights in a frame attached to the patient’s back. Several augmented reality navigation devices use manual image superimposition [ 23 ], while sophisticated surface feature recognition methods have been proposed in experimental models [ 9 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhesive skin markers are used by the augmented reality surgical navigation system (ARSN) commercially known as ClarifEye (Philips, Best, The Netherlands), while Spine Mask (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) utilizes LED lights in a frame attached to the patient’s back. Several augmented reality navigation devices use manual image superimposition [ 23 ], while sophisticated surface feature recognition methods have been proposed in experimental models [ 9 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%