Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/d18-1388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-view Models for Political Ideology Detection of News Articles

Abstract: A news article's title, content and link structure often reveal its political ideology. However, most existing works on automatic political ideology detection only leverage textual cues. Drawing inspiration from recent advances in neural inference, we propose a novel attention based multi-view model to leverage cues from all of the above views to identify the ideology evinced by a news article. Our model draws on advances in representation learning in natural language processing and network science to capture … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proliferation of false information has attracted a lot of research interest recently. This includes challenging the truthiness of news (Brill, 2001;Hardalov et al, 2016;Potthast et al, 2018), of news sources (Baly et al, 2018, and of social media posts (Canini et al, 2011;Castillo et al, 2011;Zubiaga et al, 2016), as well as studying credibility, influence, bias, and propaganda (Ba et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2013;Mihaylov et al, 2015;Kulkarni et al, 2018;Baly et al, 2018;Mihaylov et al, 2018;Barrón-Cedeño et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proliferation of false information has attracted a lot of research interest recently. This includes challenging the truthiness of news (Brill, 2001;Hardalov et al, 2016;Potthast et al, 2018), of news sources (Baly et al, 2018, and of social media posts (Canini et al, 2011;Castillo et al, 2011;Zubiaga et al, 2016), as well as studying credibility, influence, bias, and propaganda (Ba et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2013;Mihaylov et al, 2015;Kulkarni et al, 2018;Baly et al, 2018;Mihaylov et al, 2018;Barrón-Cedeño et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of bias and disinformation has attracted significant attention, especially after the 2016 US presidential election (Brill, 2001;Finberg et al, 2002;Castillo et al, 2011;Baly et al, 2018a;Kulkarni et al, 2018;Mihaylov et al, 2018;Baly et al, 2019). Most approaches have focused on predicting credibility, bias or stance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Potthast et al (2018) classified the bias in a target article as (i) left vs. right vs. mainstream, or as (ii) hyper-partisan vs. mainstream. Left-vs-right bias classification at the article level was also explored by Kulkarni et al (2018), who modeled both text and URL structure. Some work targeted bias at the phrase or the sentence level (Iyyer et al, 2014), for political speeches (Sim et al, 2013) or legislative documents (Gerrish and Blei, 2011), or targeting users in Twitter (Preoţiuc-Pietro et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%