2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-wall carbon nanotube networks as potential resistive gas sensors for organic vapor detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates better nanotube dispersion in the aqueous suspension during filtration process and network formation when nanotubes are deposited individually or as a small CNT bundles. The similar finding was described in our previous paper using different kind of MWCNTs [4]. The electrical resistance of MWCNT network is mainly affected by the resistance of inter-tube contacts and the number of contacts, since the conductive nanotubes are short (max.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It indicates better nanotube dispersion in the aqueous suspension during filtration process and network formation when nanotubes are deposited individually or as a small CNT bundles. The similar finding was described in our previous paper using different kind of MWCNTs [4]. The electrical resistance of MWCNT network is mainly affected by the resistance of inter-tube contacts and the number of contacts, since the conductive nanotubes are short (max.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…several micrometers) and cannot create a continuous conductive path [16,17]. However, according to our measurement, the oxidation also increases the network resistance [4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dispersion was sonicated at 40°C for an hour using UP-400S Dr. Hielsher GmbH apparatus (horn H7, amplitude 88 μm, power density 300 W/cm 3 , frequency 24 kHz) at 50% power of the apparatus and in 50% pulse mode. The product was filtered and washed with concentrated HCl to remove MnO 2 [8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%