Multiagent Culture Algorithm-Based Interactive Design of College English Online Teaching Process

Abstract

Traditional educational techniques and conceptions no longer match the need of the society for talent training. It is due to the fact that educational reforms are deepening and more open interactive teaching models have begun to be gradually implemented in college English instruction. The method’s innovation and reform can not only fully respect the students’ dominating position but also entice students to devote themselves to the English classroom with greater zeal which is helpful in allowing for deeper knowledge discovery and thinking. This study has the motive to examine the interactive teaching mode’s application tactics in college English classrooms, particularly with the goal of improving the effectiveness of English classroom teaching and promoting the high-quality growth of today’s college students. Furthermore, in order to improve the interactivity of online English teaching in colleges and universities, this research proposes an intelligent conversation system based on multiagents to aid in the improvement of online teaching. Finally, using a public discourse corpus dataset for implementation, the proposed model proves to have better performance than existing state of the art approaches.

Classroom Behaviour of Talent Cultivation in Colleges and Universities Supported by Deep Learning Technology

“…First, the employment situation of Developer College students is outlined, as well as the shortcomings of job assistance courses. Peng [25] investigated the interactive teaching mode's application strategies in college classrooms to maximise the efficacy of class time and encourage high-quality development among today's modern college students.…”

Retracted: Multiagent Culture Algorithm‐Based Interactive Design of College English Online Teaching Process

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”