2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3148426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multibeam Doppler Sensor-Based Non-Contact Heartbeat Detection Using Beam Diversity

Abstract: Heartbeat detection could enable various applications in the medical and health care fields. In particular, non-contact heartbeat detection can be acceptable for those who have difficulty wearing devices, such as burn patients and infants. A Doppler sensor could be a key device to realize heartbeat detection without any wearable devices. Many researches in recent years have focused on heartbeat detection using a Doppler sensor with a single beam Doppler sensor. However, when the SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio) of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the variation in R-R Interval (RRI) has been identified as a valuable parameter for assessing both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular conditions in a subject (Aram & Setarehdan, 2013;W. Hu et al, 2014;Kitagawa et al, 2022;Shi et al, 2023;Xiang et al, 2023;Yamamoto & Ohtsuki, 2021;Ye & Ohtsuki, 2021;Zar & Tun, 2022). Traditional approaches for RRI estimation involve the use of established heartbeat monitoring systems such as Electrocardiogram (ECG) or Photoplethysmography (PPG) (Tun, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the variation in R-R Interval (RRI) has been identified as a valuable parameter for assessing both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular conditions in a subject (Aram & Setarehdan, 2013;W. Hu et al, 2014;Kitagawa et al, 2022;Shi et al, 2023;Xiang et al, 2023;Yamamoto & Ohtsuki, 2021;Ye & Ohtsuki, 2021;Zar & Tun, 2022). Traditional approaches for RRI estimation involve the use of established heartbeat monitoring systems such as Electrocardiogram (ECG) or Photoplethysmography (PPG) (Tun, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common methods for monitoring heart rate are electrocardiography and photoplethysmography. These use contacttype sensors that can cause discomfort and restrict the wearer's activities [5] and are therefore unsuitable for long-term monitoring applications. In contrast, radar-based methods that measure body surface displacement caused by heart motion and pulse waves have attracted attention because they enable long-term heartbeat monitoring without sensor attachment [6]- [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%