2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2010)136:8(709)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multibody Dynamics Approach to the Modeling of Friction Wedge Elements for Freight Train Suspensions. I: Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models [2,3,4,5,6] were used primarily to investigate bounce inputs with no warp, or with a constant bolster yaw angle. The research presented in this thesis is a continuation of the prior work done at the RTL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models [2,3,4,5,6] were used primarily to investigate bounce inputs with no warp, or with a constant bolster yaw angle. The research presented in this thesis is a continuation of the prior work done at the RTL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The friction surfaces between a side frame and a wedge can be perpendicular to the track or have a small angle of inclination (no bigger than 3 degrees or 0.052 radians). According to the situations of the toe angle, a wedge suspension can be toe-out (Figure 3(a)), no-toe (Figure 3(b)) or toe-in (Figure 3(c)) (Steets et al., 2010a; Steets et al., 2010b; Ballew et al., 2011).
Figure 3.Toe angles: (a) toe-out, (b) no-toe and (c) toe-in.
…”
Section: Modeling Of Wedge Suspensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%