2001
DOI: 10.1109/4234.917107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicast delivery based on unicast and subnet multicast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of IM is similar to other previously proposed protocols such as Scattercast, YOID, AMT, Universal Multicast (UM) and Subnet Multicast (SM) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. While many of these protocols require some special nodes (such as proxies or routers) or manual configuration of inter-host connections, IM is fully autonomous and does not need that.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The idea of IM is similar to other previously proposed protocols such as Scattercast, YOID, AMT, Universal Multicast (UM) and Subnet Multicast (SM) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. While many of these protocols require some special nodes (such as proxies or routers) or manual configuration of inter-host connections, IM is fully autonomous and does not need that.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Subset Multicast (SM) tries to solve the issue of connecting multicast islands by having the source island forward a copy of the data to each island [6]. While SM works independently from the underlying native multicast protocol, a source must have a database of every interested island and manage the database.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, most of the current webcasting services are being provided over the unicast networks. The recently focused Contents Delivery Networks (CDN) service is also dependent on unicast transports in the networks [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%