2009
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter clinical experience with an atrial lead designed to minimize far-field R-wave sensing

Abstract: The OptiSense lead reduced ventricular far-field sensing in the atrium while maintaining satisfactory pacing and sensing performance, resulting in less inappropriate mode switch.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23, 24 The capture and sensing thresholds of these leads were similar and remained stable in the long term. [23][24][25] In our study, the prevalence of sensed FFRW in the LAS region at an atrial sensitivity ≥0.3 mV was significantly higher when the ring-tip electrodes spacing was 10.0 mm than when it was 1.1 mm, while the pacing and sensing thresholds were similar. Thus, a shorter interelectrode spacing of the atrial lead lowered the likelihood of sensed FFRW, without interfering with pacing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…23, 24 The capture and sensing thresholds of these leads were similar and remained stable in the long term. [23][24][25] In our study, the prevalence of sensed FFRW in the LAS region at an atrial sensitivity ≥0.3 mV was significantly higher when the ring-tip electrodes spacing was 10.0 mm than when it was 1.1 mm, while the pacing and sensing thresholds were similar. Thus, a shorter interelectrode spacing of the atrial lead lowered the likelihood of sensed FFRW, without interfering with pacing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…18 Effects of the Spacing of the Tip-Ring Electrode of the Bipolar Atrial Lead on FFRW Sensing in the LAS The interelectrode spacing of bipolar atrial leads determines, in part, the likelihood of FFRW sensing, 8,23-25 which tends to decrease as the spacing narrows. [23][24][25] In the RAA, at a sensitivity of 0.3 mV, FFRW were sensed in 30% of recipients of leads with 10-mm interelectrode spacing, and in none of the patients who received leads with ring-tip electrodes separated by 1.1 mm. 23, 24 The capture and sensing thresholds of these leads were similar and remained stable in the long term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study proved a significant decrease of inappropriate mode switch due to FFS by using a pacemaker system with an OptiSense™ lead compared to controls with standard leads which - however – settings were not optimized for the PVAB or the atrial sensing threshold [20]. In contrast to these reports, the present randomized trial is the first to compare the occurrence of inappropriate mode switch due to FFS with a group of patients who received a standard atrial electrode but underwent an individual optimization of the device programming, which should be regarded as “gold standard” in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the availability of new leads providing a very short tip-to-ring distance of 1.1 mm instead of traditional 10 mm spacing, FFS may be further reduced [18][20] and individual adjustment of pacemaker settings may no longer necessary to avoid FFS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%