2014
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-2482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Clinical Experience With the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier

Abstract: These multicenter, clinical experience data confirm originally published Afirma GEC test performance and demonstrate its substantial impact on clinical care recommendations. Although nonsignificant site-to-site variation exists, such differences should be anticipated by the practicing clinician. Follow-up of GEC benign nodules thus far confirm the clinical utility of this diagnostic test.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

25
172
2
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
25
172
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported PPVs range from 14% to 57% in various studies, which largely limits its clinical utility to predict the risk of malignancy. [14][15][16][17] As pointed out by Marti et al, 14 the risk of malignancy really depends on each individual institution's prevalence of malignancy. Hürthle cell-rich lesions appear to represent another limitation to the Afirma GEC test.…”
Section: Afirma Gene Expression Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported PPVs range from 14% to 57% in various studies, which largely limits its clinical utility to predict the risk of malignancy. [14][15][16][17] As pointed out by Marti et al, 14 the risk of malignancy really depends on each individual institution's prevalence of malignancy. Hürthle cell-rich lesions appear to represent another limitation to the Afirma GEC test.…”
Section: Afirma Gene Expression Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 On the other hand, 82% of patients with Afirma GEC suspicious result underwent surgery, compared with only 6% of those with Afirma GEC benign result. 17 ThyGenX TEST The identification of mutations in different types of thyroid carcinomas and the advances in the multiplexing analysis of cytology material allowed the development of genomic mutation-based tests. Gene mutations or translocation fusions associated with well-differentiated thyroid cancer have been extensively described previously.…”
Section: Afirma Gene Expression Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It, therefore, seems reasonable to use GEA for FN/SFN cases and for AUS/ FLUS lesions diagnosed on repeat FNA materials. A recent multicenter analysis 35 of 339 cytologically indeterminate nodules with the Afirma GEC confirmed its substantial effect on clinical care recommendations.…”
Section: Gene Expression Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is true especially when thyroid FNA results turn out to be indeterminate. When a nodule is indeterminate by FNA, the optimal way is to repeat FNA or undergo molecular tests (Alexander, 2008;Nikiforov et al, 2009;Nikiforov et al, 2011;Alexander et al, 2012;Kim and Alexander, 2012;Zhou et al, 2012;Nikiforov et al, 2013;Ranjbari et al, 2013;Alexander et al, 2014). Surgery, however, should be regarded as the last resort if all the other options still fail to produce satisfactory results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%