2002
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2002.119896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter, dose-ranging study of efegatran sulfate versus heparin with thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: The Promotion of Reperfusion in Myocardial Infarction Evolution (PRIME) trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described above for the chloromethyl ketones, these arginal-derived inhibitors serve as excellent biochemical tools, but they are rather unsuited for therapeutic development. Although few peptidic serine protease inhibitors with a C-terminal arginal residue, like the thrombin inhibitors CVS-1123 and efegatran, reached preclinical and clinical development, their development was discontinued mainly for two reasons: the compounds revealed limited selectivities due to their nonspecific serine trap and suffered from an insufficient antithrombotic potential compared to other direct thrombin inhibitors. The latter drawback might be partially explained by studies with the related protease inhibitor leupeptin (acetyl-Leu-Leu-Arg-H), which exists in solution mainly in its cyclized hemiaminal form (56%) and as a hydrate (42%), whereas only 2% of the inhibitory active aldehyde form was detected.…”
Section: Synthetic Active Site-directed Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described above for the chloromethyl ketones, these arginal-derived inhibitors serve as excellent biochemical tools, but they are rather unsuited for therapeutic development. Although few peptidic serine protease inhibitors with a C-terminal arginal residue, like the thrombin inhibitors CVS-1123 and efegatran, reached preclinical and clinical development, their development was discontinued mainly for two reasons: the compounds revealed limited selectivities due to their nonspecific serine trap and suffered from an insufficient antithrombotic potential compared to other direct thrombin inhibitors. The latter drawback might be partially explained by studies with the related protease inhibitor leupeptin (acetyl-Leu-Leu-Arg-H), which exists in solution mainly in its cyclized hemiaminal form (56%) and as a hydrate (42%), whereas only 2% of the inhibitory active aldehyde form was detected.…”
Section: Synthetic Active Site-directed Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%