1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01739924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter evaluation of a novel quantification method for rubella and toxoplasmosis antibodies

Abstract: Antibody quantification by EIA is possible without a standard curve. Following the so-called alpha method only one test dilution is used, the resulting absorbance is corrected and the IU/ml will be calculated by means of a mathematical formula. This new kind of a single point measurement was evaluated in seven independent laboratories by comparison with commercial EIAs using a standard curve or a titer calibration line. For the quantification of IgG against rubella virus this study comprised 1,480 individual s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…shows that our search process revealed 687 unique studies in English, and shows the numbers of studies we excluded according to specific criteria. After review of papers, we further excluded 39 studies that focused on cost minimization for strategies related to: screening of health‐care workers, women of child‐bearing age (for rubella), military recruits, college students, children prior to revaccination, or students before school entry; communications and other measures to encourage vaccination; alternative delivery or vaccine presentations (including hypothetical options); treatment; and different screening tests . We also excluded 13 papers that reported costs only for outbreaks (including any outbreak response efforts that occurred) without analysis of a comparator .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shows that our search process revealed 687 unique studies in English, and shows the numbers of studies we excluded according to specific criteria. After review of papers, we further excluded 39 studies that focused on cost minimization for strategies related to: screening of health‐care workers, women of child‐bearing age (for rubella), military recruits, college students, children prior to revaccination, or students before school entry; communications and other measures to encourage vaccination; alternative delivery or vaccine presentations (including hypothetical options); treatment; and different screening tests . We also excluded 13 papers that reported costs only for outbreaks (including any outbreak response efforts that occurred) without analysis of a comparator .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%