2020
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter External Validation of the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online: An OOG Collaborative Study

Abstract: Uveal melanoma (UM) is fatal in ~50% of patients as a result of disseminated disease. This study aims to externally validate the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online V3 (LUMPO3) to determine its reliability in predicting survival after treatment for choroidal melanoma when utilizing external data from other ocular oncology centers. Anonymized data of 1836 UM patients from seven international ocular oncology centers were analyzed with LUMPO3 to predict the 10-year survival for each patient in each ext… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, chr3 results obtained using the NGS panel were comparable to previous MLPA and MSA analyses. We recommend that this bespoke NGS panel ultimately replaces MLPA/MSA testing in routine labs, with the possibility of incorporating molecular data into prognostic tools-e.g., the LUMPO (Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online), which was recently externally validated in a multicentre study [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, chr3 results obtained using the NGS panel were comparable to previous MLPA and MSA analyses. We recommend that this bespoke NGS panel ultimately replaces MLPA/MSA testing in routine labs, with the possibility of incorporating molecular data into prognostic tools-e.g., the LUMPO (Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online), which was recently externally validated in a multicentre study [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In UM, chromosomal mutations and genetic aberrations in the primary tumour can predict with relatively high accuracy whether a UM has a low or high risk of metastasis. When incorporated with other prognostic parameters, i.e., clinical and histological characteristics, expected survival for an individual patient can be predicted [113]. This is a robust approach that has been translated into the clinic; however, it requires tissue samples obtained by fine-needle biopsies, tumour resections or enucleations [114].…”
Section: Mirnas As Clinical Biomarkers Of Ummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other well-known prognostic variables for UM, such as patient age and gender, were not considered in this work. In the future, we intend to develop a multivariable prognostic model, similar to (or a revision of) the Liverpool-developed prognostic algorithm, LUMPO3, 46 which could incorporate the DL tool and its analysis of various morphological, IHC, and genetic parameters of UM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%